Multimedia Rubrics and Checklists MS Word: Word Art Assignment Rubric Student Web Page/Multimedia Project Rubric Multimedia Project Rubric Judges Rubric For Multimedia Project
| |
Apprentice
|
Basic |
Learned
|
Exemplary
|
| Expression of
Idea |
Idea is
unclear. |
Word is clear,
relationship to graphic unclear. |
Graphic(s) and
word fit together. |
Idea is
clear. |
| Word and
Graphic Combined |
Words and
graphics are separate elements. |
Words and
graphics share common background. |
Words made of
graphic elements. |
Words and
graphics flow seamlessly |
| Colour and
Background |
B & W, no
background. |
Some colour
used. |
Good colours and
background. |
Colours and
background contribute to mood. |
| 5 different
Corel features are applied. |
No features are
used. |
1 or 2 features
are used. |
3 or 4 features
are used. |
5 features are
used. |
| Principles of
Design. |
No effort made to
apply principles. |
Some of BUCRP
applied. |
One of BUCRP not
applied. |
Application of
Principles enhances work. |
Back To
Top
| |
Apprentice
|
Basic |
Learned
|
Exemplary
|
| Story Board or
Planning Sheet |
Story board is
incomplete and lacks necessary URLs, formats, and resources to complete
project. |
Story board is
not complete. Includes few assigned elements or planned formats, necessary
URLs, and resources. |
Story board is
somewhat complete. Includes many assigned elements, in addition to most planned
formats, necessary URLs, and resources. |
Story board is
complete. Includes all assigned elements, in addition to planned formats,
necessary URLs, and resources. |
| Organization
of Content |
No logical
sequence of information; menus and paths to information are not
evident. |
Some logical
sequence of information, but menus and paths are confusing or
flawed. |
Logical sequence
of information. Menus and paths to more information are clear and
direct. |
Logical,
intuitive sequence of information. Menus and paths to all information are clear
and direct. |
| Originality |
The work is a
minimal collection or rehash of other peoples ideas, products, images and
inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. |
The work is an
extensive collection and rehash of other peoples ideas, products, images
and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or
inventiveness. |
The product shows
evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an extensive
collection of other peoples ideas, products, images and inventions, the
work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. |
The product shows
significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the
content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon
logical conclusions and sound research. |
| Copyright and
Documentation |
Sources have not
been properly cited and permissions have not been received. |
Some sources have
not been properly cited and all permissions have not been received. |
Most sources and
property cited according to MLA style; Permissions to use any graphics from web
pages or other sources have been received, printed, and saved for future
reference. |
All sources are
properly cited according to MLA style; Permissions to use any graphics from
commercial web pages on other sources have been received, printed, and saved
for future reference. |
| Format and
Platform Transferability |
The stack,
presentation, or web page plays only on either Mac or PC. There are problems
with the operation of some files and the project is not
cross-platform. |
The stack,
presentation, or web page plays best on either Mac or PC. There are problems
with the operation of some files and the project is not
cross-platform. |
Most of the
stack, presentation, or web page plays easily on both Mac and PC. Although
there are minor problems with a few files, care has been taken in naming files,
selecting technologies, or creating enhancements to produce a final product
that is cross-platform. |
The stack,
presentation, or web page plays easily on both Mac and PC. Care has been taken
in naming files, selecting technologies, or creating enhancements to produce a
final product that is cross-platform. |
| Subject
Knowledge |
Subject knowledge
is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect or flawed. |
Some subject
knowledge is evident. Some information is confusing, incorrect or
flawed. |
Subject knowledge
is evident in much of the product. Information is clear, appropriate, and
correct. |
Subject knowledge
is evident throughout (more than required). All information is clear,
appropriate, and correct. |
| Graphical
Design |
Exaggerated
emphasis upon graphics and special effects weakens the message and interferes
with the communication of content and ideas. |
Graphical and
multimedia elements accompany content but there is little sign of mutual
reinforcement. Theres no attention paid to visual design criteria such as
proportion, balance, and harmony restraint. There is some tendency toward
random use of graphics. |
Design elements
and content combine effectively to deliver a high impact message with the
graphics and the words reinforcing each other. |
The combination
of multimedia elements with words and ideas takes communication and persuasion
to a very high level, superior to what could be accomplished with either alone.
The mixture brings about synergy and dramatic effects which reach the intended
audience. |
| Mechanics |
Presentation has
four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has
three of more misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has
fewer than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has
no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
| Screen
Design |
Screens are
either confusing and cluttered or barren and stark. Buttons or navigational
tools are absent or confusing |
Screens are
difficult to navigate, but some buttons and navigational tools work. Users can
navigate a few screens. |
Screens contain
adequate navigational tools and buttons. Users can progress through screens in
a logical path to find information. |
Screens contain
all necessary navigational tools and buttons. Users can progress intuitively
through screens in a logical path to find information. |
| Use of
Enhancements |
No video, audio,
or 3-D enhancements are present or use of these tools is
inappropriate. |
Limited video,
audio, or 3-D enhancements are present. In most instances, use of these tools
is appropriate. |
Some Video,
audio, or 3-D enhancements are used appropriately to entice users to learn and
to enrich the experience. In some cases, clips are either too long or too short
to be meaningful. |
Appropriate
amounts of Video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are used effectively to entice
users to learn and to enrich the experience. Clips are long enough convey
meaning without being too lengthy. |
| Teamwork |
One or two people
did all or most of the work |
Most team members
participated in some aspect of the work, but workloads varied. |
Most team members
contributed their fair share of the work. |
The workload was
divided and shared equally by all team members. |
Back To
Top
| |
Apprentice
|
Basic |
Learned
|
Exemplary
|
| Topic/
Content |
Includes little
essential information and one or two facts. |
Includes come
essential information with few citations and few facts. |
Includes
essential information with most sources properly cited. Includes enough
elaboration to give readers an understanding of the topic. |
Covers topic
completely and in depth. Includes properly cited sources and complete
information. Encourages readers to know more. |
| Technical
Requirements (To be filled in by teacher) |
Includes ____
cards or less, few graphics from outside sources, few animations and advanced
features. |
Includes ____
cards or less, fewer than 3 graphics from outside sources, fewer than 3
animations and few advanced features, such as video, 3PD or sound. |
Includes at least
____ cards, at least 3 graphics from outside sources, at least 3 animations and
some advanced features, such as video. |
Includes at least
____ cards, 5 or more graphics from outside sources, 5 or more animations and
several advanced features, such as video. |
| Mechanics |
Includes more
than 5 grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors, etc. |
Includes 3-4
grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors, etc. |
Includes 2-3
grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors, etc. |
Grammar,
spelling, punctuation, capitalization are correct. No errors in the
text. |
| Cooperative
Group Work |
Cannot work with
others in most situations. Cannot share decisions or
responsibilities. |
Works with
others, but has difficulty sharing decisions and responsibilities. |
Works well with
others. Takes part in most decisions and contributes fair share to
group. |
Works well with
others. Assumes a clear role and related responsibilities. Motivates other to
do their best. |
| Oral
Presentation Skills |
Great difficulty
communicating ideas. Poor voice projection. Little preparation or incomplete
work. |
Some difficulty
in communication of ideas, due to voice projection, lack of preparation, or
incomplete work. |
Communicates
ideas with proper voice projection. Adequate preparation and
delivery. |
Communicates
ideas with enthusiasm, voice projection, clear language and
delivery. |
Back To
Top
| |
Apprentice |
Basic |
Learned |
Exemplary |
| Copyright and
Permissions |
Every graphic or sound file is either original, free of copyright,
or permission for its use in this contest has been obtained from the
creator/owner. Hard copies of letters of permission are available. All sources
of information have been properly cited in MLA format. |
| Curriculum Alignment |
No
evidence of relationship to target curriculum; no reference to facts and
properly documented resources. Users are not likely to learn from this
product. |
Some
evidence of connection to target curriculum; a few references to facts and
properly documented resources. Users find it difficult to learn from this
product. |
Adequate evidence of connection to target curriculum; clear
references to facts and properly documented resources. Users can learn from
this product. |
Clear evidence of connection to garget curriculum; frequent
references to facts and properly documented resources. Users are likely to
learn from this product. |
| Work Completed in the Classroom |
Less
than 45% of the work was completed in the classroom. |
45
59% of the work was completed in the classroom |
60
74% of the work was completed in the classroom |
75
100% of the work was completed in the classroom. |
| Teamwork |
The
work load was not divided equally and few team members contributed their fair
share. |
Most
team members participated in some aspect of the work. But workloads
varied. |
Most
team members contributed their fair share of the work. |
The
workload was divided and shared equally by all team members. |
| Organization of Content |
No
logical sequence of information; menus and paths to information are not
evident. |
Some
logical sequence of information, but menus and paths are confusing or
flawed. |
Logical sequence of information. Menus and paths to more
information are clear and direct. |
Logical, intuitive sequence of information. Menus and paths to all
information are clear and direct. |
| Originality |
The
work is a minimal collection or rehash of other peoples ideas, products,
images and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. |
The
work is an extensive collection and rehash of other peoples ideas,
products, images and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or
inventiveness. |
The
product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an
extensive collection of other peoples ideas, products, images and
inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new
insights. |
The
product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The
majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive,
and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. |
| Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing,
incorrect or flawed. |
Some
subject knowledge is evident. Some information is confusing, incorrect or
flawed. |
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the product. Information
is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout. (More than required.) All
information is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
| Graphical Design |
Exaggerated emphasis upon graphics and special effects weakens the
message and interferes with the communication of content and ideas. |
Graphical and multimedia elements accompany content but there is
little sign of mutual reinforcement. There is no attention paid to visual
design criteria such as balance, proportion, harmony and restraint. There is
some tendency toward random use of graphical elements. |
Design elements and content combine effectively to deliver a high
impact message with the graphics and the words reinforcing each
other. |
The
combination of multimedia elements with words and ideas takes communication and
persuasion to a very high level, superior to what could be accomplished with
either alone. The mixture brings about synergy and dramatic effects which reach
the intended audience with style, pizzazz and elegance. |
| Mechanics |
Presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has three or more misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has fewer than two misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical
errors. |
| Screen Design |
Screens are either confusing and cluttered or barren and stark.
Buttons or navigational tools are absent or confusing. |
Screens are difficult to navigate, but some buttons and
navigational tools work. Users can navigate a few screens. |
Screens contain adequate navigational tools and buttons. Users can
progress through screens in a logical path to find information. |
Screens contain all necessary navigational tools and buttons.
Users can progress intuitively through screens in a logical path to find
information. |
| Use of Enhancements |
No
video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are present or use of these tools is
inappropriate. |
Limited video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are present. In most
instances, use of these tools is appropriate. |
Some
Video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are used appropriately to entice users to
learn and to enrich the experience. In some cases, clips are either too long or
too short to be meaningful. |
Appropriate amounts of Video, audio, or 3-D enhancements are used
effectively to entice users to learn and to enrich the experience. Clips are
long enough to convey meaning without being too lengthy. |
|