|
PRINTS
Parents' Roles Interacting with Teacher Support
A Collaborative Literacy Project
William T. Fagan, Jim Anderson, Mary Cronin
The importance of the home on school reaming has been well
documented through research, with some researchers describing the home
as the most powerful institution influencing early literacy. There is
no doubt that partnerships between home and school are the key to the
success of young children, especially children of low-income,
low-education parents. However, an effective partnership must
recognize both sides as being essential. An effective home-school
partnership is not formed if the school tends to "tell" the
parents what to do. Both teachers and parents must both contribute to
the literacy development of the children. This was a key goal of the
PRINTS program which was initiated in MacMorran and Rabbittown
Community Centres, and St. Pius X Primary School, St. John's in 1997.
A Collaborative Approach
Any project is more likely to be successful if it operates within
a collaborative framework. This involves capitalizing on what is
currently available, on involving various stakeholders, and on
providing for the continuance of the project in other settings. PRINTS
was successful on all three accounts. The model on which the PRINTS
program was developed was based on the work done by Dr. W. T. Fagan,
both from a research angle and from a partnership project which he
implemented at St. Teresa's School, St. John's, two years ago, and on
work done by Peter Hannan and Cathy Nutbrown in Britain. Parents,
teachers, children, principal, volunteers, and community centre
directors were involved. A plan for the continuance of the project was
to develop a handbook containing procedures for implementing the
program, details of all session plans and activities, evaluation
activities, etc. A first draft (not ready for distribution) has been
completed.
The PRINTS Model
The PRINTS model consists of eve strands or contexts in which
early literacy develops (talk, play, environmental print, reading
materials, drawing/writing materials), each of which encompasses five
roles of parents or teachers (providing opportunity, recognizing,
interacting, modelling, and setting guidelines). Sessions for each
strand involve providing an overview of the strand, providing time for
parents and teachers to share what that strand means to them, and how
they operationalize it, providing lots of positive reinforcement,
discussing implications of certain home-based activities for school
learning, sharing a range of activities in each of the five strands
for literacy development. Children's "small books" and
educational toys were distributed periodically. The teachers and
parents initially met separately but the facilitator was able to share
information from one group to the other.
There were 13 two-hour sessions for the parents: an introductory
session, 2 sessions each for each of the five strands (10), two
wrap-up sessions, involving parents and teachers. For the teachers,
there was one session per strand. In all, there were 10 parents and 10
children who ranged from age 2 to 6.
Outcomes
Outcomes were assessed in formal and informal ways. Opinionnaires
were given to parents who also evaluated all the activities shared
during the sessions. The facilitators and the teachers kept journals
or logs. Within session there was a sharing of information about the
parents' and their children's involvement in the literacy development
activities.
The program was overwhelmingly successful from the following
perspectives.
Parent commitment
Attendance was high. Parents took responsibility whenever
possible for Running the project. They developed insights into the
many activities in which they were already engaging their children in
terms of how they affected literacy development. They became familiar
with a range of other literacy development activities.
Parent literacy awareness
An opinionnaire administered to the parents prior to and at the
end of the program showed that their views on literacy development
changed more towards a holistic perspective, in which children are
more likely to develop literacy expertise if they are immersed in
meaningful reading, writing, and oral language experiences. The
parents became more aware of how stories are meaningfully read with
children, and how children learn from books.
Parent Self-Confidence
Parents became more confident in their knowledge of literacy
development and felt secure in discussing literacy issues with
teachers. Technical literacy terms (e.g. scaffolding, invented
spelling) were introduced when an appropriate occasion arose. Parents
no longer felt excluded from the "language of literacy"
common among educators.
Child literacy development
The children developed more facility over language, including
letters and words. They developed meaningful concepts of reading and
writing, as exemplified in their engaging in, and/or modelling these
activities. The latter was especially evident when they "read"
to their friends.
Parent directed/child focussed
The program was aimed at empowering parents as
teachers/facilitators of literacy. The facilitators did not work
directly with the children, the parents did. This seemed to be a more
effective model for literacy development. Work with the children by
the facilitators would only last for a certain period of time. By
providing the parents with the necessary literacy skills, they could
work with their children as long as there was a need. Perhaps the best
indicators of the effectiveness of this approach, were comments
contributed by the parents. One such comment by a parent with respect
to a literacy activity that had been discussed was, "She'll grow
into it."
After an activity was shared, parents were always asked how this
might be modified for their children's level of development. This
parent explained that her daughter (age 3) would not be able to
participate in the activity now, but when she was mature enough, she
(the parent) was ready as she knew how to involve the child. This
summarizes the role of parents as collaborators in literacy
development - as having the knowledge, and being ready to facilitate
literacy development when their children can benefit most from
involvement in literacy and literacy related activities.
Reference
Hannan, P., & Nutbrown, C. (April, 1996).
Teachers' use of a theoretical framework for preschool literacy
intervention for parents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Education Research Association.
Council Announces Temporary Appointment
The Literacy Development Council is pleased to announce the
temporary appointment of Judy Anderson as Executive Director,
effective October 27, 1997.
Ms. Anderson will be replacing David Gale, who has been seconded to
Treasury Board, until August 31, 1998. Ms. Anderson can be reached at
our St. John's office.
Provincial Literacy Resource Collection
Nears Completion
The Provincial Public Libraries Board is putting the finishing
touches to a newly compiled literacy collection. This compilation is
the end result of the study carried out by the Board to determine the
need for a provincial literacy resource centre. While the
recommendations of that feasibility study are still under review, the
Literacy Resource Collection is catalogued, organized and ready for
circulation. A total of over 500 items, including books, videos and
tapes, are now housed in a newly created Literacy Resource Room at the
Gander Public Library. The room has been made available to allow
tutors, reamers, practitioners and researchers use of the facility as
needed, and have the entire collection at their fingertips. Plans are
under way to link an annotated list of the holding to the Public
Libraries homepage, and a printed catalogue for those in the field
without Internet access. For further information about the collection,
call Pat Parsons at 651-2781.
Survey Enclosed
The Literacy Development Council is evaluating First-Time
Readers. Part of this evaluation includes input from practitioners and
tutors. We would appreciate you taking the time to complete the
enclosed survey.
Evaluation forms, designed with reamers in mind, have been
distributed through the September issue of First-Time Readers. If you
have completed one of these surveys please disregard the enclosed
survey.
The purpose of the survey is to give the Literacy Development
Council an understanding of the need and future direction of
First-Time Readers.
|