Continued from previous page....

  1. People with learning disabilities. This is a definite subgroup within the target population. Some adults went through their school experience not knowing they had a disability, but knowing that they had problems with learning. Other adults had their problems detected, but nothing was done for them in school. The usual college placement tests are not sufficient to detect specific disabilities. Apparently, there are very few community diagnostic and assessment centres for learning disabled adults. Several of the interviewed adults had gone to the Capability Centre in Victoria for diagnosis. This Centre is unique and struggling for funds. Other adults had had to make use of local school board special services.

    Adults with learning disabilities who were participating in programs made special pleas for different instructional strategies, the use of auditory and visual techniques in learning, more individualized help, and work with computers. These adults also need support networks and advocates. The Association of Learning Disabled Adults (ALDA) is trying to offer this kind of help to people who need it.

  2. Trades training, or the next step. This was another major issue and of concern to many of the participants and others. It is of particular concern in the smaller centres where job opportunities are already limited. Many participants have returned or come to ABE so they do not have to be chambermaids, dishwashers, and loggers for the rest of their lives. Yet they see the credentials for trades and other jobs being made higher and more complicated, and wonder if they are "shut out" before they start. The current emphasis of the financial support system through MSSH is on employability. Some people from the smaller centres said they needed a job training centre where specific employable skills for which there was a demand could be taught. Aspects of carpentry, plumbing, electrical and mechanical trades could perhaps be taught without the full apprenticeship or trades training, especially in areas where there is a demand for skilled tradesmen. One man said, I would really like to work. They have employment training programs for people on UIC, but nothing for people on social assistance."

    Camosun College's Basic Vocational Skills Development program was quoted as a useful model by some of the adults interviewed.

  3. Bureaucratic hassles. Many interviewees and participants railed against the system. There were one or two who had been caught up with the loss of unemployment benefits because they had returned to school. There were others who felt their workers tried to be superior and treated them in a demeaning and insensitive manner. Many of the men commented that single women with children get a better deal. They all seemed to know someone with fewer dependents than themselves who were receiving more money, The emphasis on goals and employability worried others. "You have to have a goal. How do I know what my goal is? That's why I want to come to school," said one man. "You can't get any support from welfare after Grade 10," said someone else. Many people did not seem to know that they could get bus passes, daycare subsidy and a clothing allowance if they needed it. It seems that if they do not ask the questions they do not get the answers. Changes in government policy add to the confusion. Many financial assistance workers and rehab officers receive limited training for their jobs. Training is really on-the-job. Additional training may prepare workers to be more sensitive towards students and potential students.

Continued on next page....



Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page