Interaction with the Project Co–ordinator

• She is very on the ball – determined and organized. She will do a good job and doesn't mind telling it like it is.
• Couldn't have any better. She was there when we needed her and when we didn't need her.
• The Project Co–ordinator was helpful and did what was required.
• Good overall. Doesn't deal with her very much. She is very thorough – on top of things. Very responsive.
• Excellent – can't say anything else about her. Everything is done when it is supposed to be done. Very organized (laugh) No back doors with her. Really good to work with.
• I see her at the meetings and I find her good.
• The co-ordinator is a little immature. Not overall bad. She tended to treat the participants in an immature way (all the participants were older than her.)
• Not bad, but she couldn't speak up to the sponsor. She couldn't make any decisions. It got a little annoying at times. Hopefully now with a new sponsor it will be better. I think she is capable of doing the job if she is allowed to. Communication was an issue and can be aggravating. Couldn't have the co–ordinator undermining him, but the communications were poor. Most of the root was in the sponsor.
• More than adequate. From her side – great to have the liaison. A little too much – overkill. Definitely makes it easier for him – like having an Executive Assistant beside him to help with him. As an individual she is great – superb. She is very direct and he likes that. The realities of having two projects for one co–ordinator is the realities of the demands of travel. It enables him to be a partner and not a manager of the project.