The survey conducted by Lapierre (2005), consisting of interviews with the employees of companies subject to Bill 90, reported the reasons given by employees who had not participated in any funded ALT, despite offers from their employers. Footnote 45
Canada | Quebec | |
---|---|---|
Source: Statistics Canada (2003) | ||
N = 25,056 | ||
The training was too expensive | 43 | 29 |
Too busy at work | 32 | 29 |
Conflict with work schedule | 27 | 25 |
Family responsibilities | 26 | 21 |
The training was not appropriate | 16 | 11 |
Other reasons | 10 | 11 |
It was not worthwhile | 7 | 10 |
Could not find training | 7 | 7 |
Health reasons | 6 | 7 |
Lack of support from the employer | 9 | 6 |
Did not have the necessary prerequisites | 5 | 5 |
Quebec | |
---|---|
Source: Lapierre et al. (2005). | |
N = 1,899 | |
Personal reasons (health, family, -) | 29 |
No need or lack of interest | 25 |
Training cancelled or postponed | 19 |
Not useful for my work | 11 |
No time (too much work) | 9 |
Other reasons | 7 |
Return to note 45 40% of the employees interviewed had not participated in any activity and approximately 12% of them had been offered employer-sponsored ALT.