In spite of Fitzpatrick's occasional attacks on the length of the working day of frontier workers, the sanitary conditions in the camps, etc., his overall message could only have been received with sympathy among the new "corporate-liberal " fraction of employers. Even as he decried some employer practices, he clearly minimized their significance by identifying lliteracy as the primary source of the problems of campmen. Moreover, there was a distinctly religious tone in Fitzpatrick's writings, conveying a sense of missionary activity rather than of political activism. 37 (This was probably both a conditioned habit, given his background of church training, and a calculated tactic, in view of the fact that the Reading Camp Association depended to a large degree on contributions from churches and church members. Overall, Fitzpatrick's reformism was one that employers could live with, given the alternatives. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that in 1903:
(Lest these grants be seen as anything other than what they are--tokens--it must be pointed out that there were more than 50,000 men labouring in the lumber industry alone in Ontario in 1903.) 39 Through their support for Fitzpatrick's work, employers could appear as 'concerned' and 'responsible'. However, in addition to the legitimation function, we must not overlook what were more mundane, but significant material benefits derived by employers. Fitzpatrick wrote:
|
| Back | Table of Contents | Next Page |