Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: Mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.) Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ohio Department of Education. (2003). Ohio Adult Basic and Literacy Education (ABLE) Ohio mathematics benchmarks. Available online at: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/ctae/adult/able/

Ontario Literacy Coalition. (2000). The level descriptions manual: A learning outcomes approach to describing levels of skill in communications & numeracy. Ontario, Canada: author. Available online at: http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/levels/levels.pdf

Organization for Economic and Community Development. (2003). The OECD Programme for International School Assessment (PISA) online.

Orrill, R. (2001). Mathematics, numeracy, and democracy. In L.A. Steen (Ed.). Mathematics and democracy (pp xiii–xix). Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.

Pesek, D. D., & Kirshner, D. (2000). Interference of instrumental instruction in subsequent relational learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 524–540.

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2000). The national standards for adult literacy, numeracy and ICT. London: Author. Available online at: http://www.qca.org.uk/downloads/14130_national_standards_for_adult_literacy_numeracy_ict.pdf

Schmitt, M. J. (Reprint 2006). The answer is still the same. It doesn’t matter how you got it. Snow Camp, NC: Peppercorn Press.

Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Scribner, S. & Stevens, J. (1989). Experimental studies on the relationship of school math and work math [Technical Paper No. 4]. New York: The Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York.