THE FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT TEAM

The first three months of the project were critical in determining the viability of the framework. There were two key deliverables for the CSC Project:

  1. a draft assessment framework for documenting learner progress consistent across sectors and streams
  2. a draft outline of “performance indicators” for skills gains critical for transition to next steps

In total, seventeen sector (college, school board and community-based) and stream (Native, Anglophone, Francophone and Deaf) projects were funded to help build the framework. While the projects could involve any of the nine Essential Skills, the focus, for accountability purposes, was on Reading Text, Document Use and Numeracy, since these three skills are considered to be the most critical to learner success and because valid, reliable instruments are available to assess them.

Five projects were responsible for the development of the transition paths. They include:

SECTOR/STREAM TRANSITION PATH
CSC (College Sector Committee for
Adult Upgrading)
project lead
• postsecondary
• pre-apprenticeship/ apprenticeship
CESBA (Ontario Association of Adult
and Continuing Education School
Board Administrators)
credit programming
CLO (Community Literacy of Ontario) lifelong learning
Le CAP (Centre d'apprentissage et de
perfectionnement inc.)
pre-apprenticeship/apprenticeship
PTP Adult Learning and
Employment Programs
• high skills employment
• low skills employment

It’s important to note that TCU has already made a significant, long-term investment in workforce literacy development with PTP’s CAMERA-Signposts assessment and curriculum guidelines system. This system was designed for learners with the goal of entry-level employment. PTP’s project, CAMERA: Taking it to the field, would capitalize on this investment. CAMERA and Signposts have drawn extensively on Essential Skills research, outlining workforce literacy outcomes and bridging instructional content with assessment activities and results. Although Signposts has been completed, assigning issues surrounding it and the possible implications for programs. While general information on the framework has been shared with the field in a variety of ways, it has not been shared consistently.