|
Companies that don't have formal grant systems
Even if the company does not have a specific grants program, don't give up.
You still may be able to get a contribution. Here are indicators to look for:
- Does the company have an affirmative action program, or special programs to
hire the disabled, or promote employment equity?
- Have they sponsored events in the community that relate to your issues?
- Have they received awards for being a responsible company?
Charities and business have different views of what motivates giving
Nonprofit groups often have a jaundiced view of business givers. Grassroots
organizations can be suspicious of companies, even hostile. One study of arts
groups provides interesting data on this phenomenon. Arts groups may not be
typical of all nonprofits, but their attitude probably is.
Arts groups believe businesses support the arts largely to benefit
their own companies, though most business executives say this is not so they
support the arts mainly to benefit society. These conflicting views were
revealed in a study by the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada by the
Angus Reid Group Inc, September 1992.
Arts Organizations' Perceptions of Business Reasons for Supporting the
Arts
| Benefit to company |
92% |
| Benefit to society |
64% |
| Ongoing relationship |
48% |
| Wider exposure of arts |
48% |
| Developing contacts |
44% |
| Board/CEO relationship |
36% |
| Educating business and arts |
16% |
Companies' Reasons for Supporting the Arts
| |
Donations
Officer |
Marketing
Manager |
| Benefit to society |
85% |
65% |
| Wider exposure of arts |
69% |
59% |
| Ongoing relationship |
51% |
65% |
| Benefit to company |
48% |
48% |
| Educating business and arts |
42% |
43% |
| Developing contacts |
36% |
19% |
| Board/CEO relationship |
33% |
38% |
The true nature of many companies' attitudes to nonprofit giving is perhaps
summed up in this extract from an interview with a key executive at Xerox:
Corporate gifts to charity
make cents, executives say
Corporate philanthropy doesn't just make you feel good, it's good
business
Harry Cogill, director of public affairs for Xerox Canada Ltd,
said businesses should establish themselves as good corporate citizens to avoid
possible negative reaction from interested parties.
Successful businesses today know that they don't report just to
shareholders, Cogill said. They realize that they're accountable to
a range of stakeholders including employees, suppliers, customers and
the public at large.
But Cogill said firms that establish a good reputation also reap tangible
financial rewards.
In the short term, you earn the respect and loyalty of the community
many of whom are customers or potential customers. Cogill said.
And when you consider today, more than ever before, people base their
business decisions on ethical concerns, your identity as a caring, involved,
moral entity is no small advantage.
Bob Papoe
The Toronto Star, 23 May 1991
Who Knows Whom: Discovering Your Contacts
Do you have any personal links to the company? Trying to use influence to
get a grant is not always essential, and can even backfire. More often it
helps. If no official grant program exists, it may become essential to know
people at the top.
Remember, people give to people. Companies don't give money, people in the
company do. You may have to mine your contacts.
Many groups assume that they have no contacts in the major leagues, and give
up too soon. Don't underestimate the importance of `minor league' contacts.
Don't be surprised if people in your group have contacts (perhaps a little
distant) that you never suspected.
Feeling unconnected is especially common among people in small communities
far from the corporate headquarters, and in groups of disabled or
institutionalized people, and self-help organizations. They are too often cut
off from circles of power by societal barriers.
Years of experience have shown that most groups do have (or can develop)
wider networks than they at first believe. A technique has been developed and
used many times to help people discover connections people have forgotten they
had. Careful probing among the board, membership, friends and family may reveal
surprising webs of contacts.
This process works best if each individual is asked privately at first,
since people may not want to reveal connections publicly. Afterwards, a group
brainstorming session may help people think of forgotten links.
Reassure everyone that they need not necessarily make the approach
personally (although that might be better). Their name need not even be
mentioned to the prospective donor, if they prefer.
Ask if they have any contacts in specific companies you name, no matter how
remote, or how high or low on the corporate ladder.
It is best to focus attention on a few areas by asking your team who they
know in a specific category, such as banking (almost everyone has a bank
account), petroleum products (most Canadians own cars), lawyers, teachers, the
fast food industry, etc. Jog minds by asking people to think back through
places they have met people: in school; at conferences or on vacation; other
parents in the same day-care centre, and so on. Don't forget relatives and
neighbours.
For more information on running a Webbing Session, see the resource
directory for details. Ask for a free copy of Face to Face from the
Voluntary Action Program.
Are any of the company's employees involved as volunteers with your group?
Do you serve any as clients? Companies are more likely to support organizations
in which employees have shown interest. Many companies have specific policies
that they will provide support on this basis. To name just a few, this
includes:
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd
- Canadian Oxygen Ltd
- Canadian Pacific Ltd
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd
- National Bank of Canada
- Nestlé Canada Inc
- Suncor Inc
Like many companies, The Investors Group Inc, based in Winnipeg, has a
matching gift program. In their case, it is open to all full-time and
permanent part-time employees, sales representative and retirees
The
Corporation will match gifts made by employees and directors on a
dollar-for-dollar basis up to a maximum of $500 per year per employee/director.
The minimum amount applicable, $50
Where an employee's involvement in the
organization in question is in a leadership role, the Corporation may consider
increasing the maximum amount to $1,000. They will also provide grants of
up to $2,000 to any organization where the employee or a member of their
immediate family has volunteered for at least six months. If three or more
employees volunteer with the group, the amount of the grant can increase to
$3,500.
Health and social service agencies must be careful not to violate any rules
of confidentiality by revealing to the company the names of their employees who
the group helped but it is acceptable to say that you have done so in a
general way.
Does anyone in a company have personal reasons to be concerned with your
issues? These facts may not be widely known, but may reveal potential
supporters.
A member of the Eaton family, for example, had a hearing loss, and as a
result John Craig Eaton has been an active volunteer and chair of the board of
the Canadian Hearing Society.
The Four Seasons Hotel chain has a well established giving program. But in
addition, the founding president of Four Seasons, Issy Sharp, lost a son to
cancer, and has made many personal donations to organizations fighting cancer
(see Toronto Life, May 1986, p 25, for an interesting profile).
Do you have contacts with any of a company's major suppliers or customers?
They might exercise influence on your behalf. This can be particularly
effective if the company does not have a well organized giving policy. A senior
executive at a world-famous company once pointed out that, since McDonald's was
his company's largest customer, he made donations to any charity promoted by
McDonald's management before he considered other applications.
If you currently have supporters in the private sector (whether business,
foundation or prominent individual), ask if they will take an active role in
helping you find more donations. They may well have contacts with other
funders. They may share information with you, or actually make calls on your
behalf.
People willing to take on this role will be most helpful if they act as a
`broker' for you. Sending a request on their letterhead is good. It is better
still if they will phone or visit their contact.
If after all this you still feel totally without existing workable contacts,
you may still be able to develop connections. Call on people sympathetic to
your cause who might make connections for you, such as a journalist, a local
politician, a doctor or a lawyer. Also contact faculty at the local college,
and fundraisers (staff or volunteers) for a local charity or service club. Call
and ask for an opportunity to explain your case, and ask for their help in
brainstorming potential supporters.
Could outsiders take over the power in your group?
Consumer-controlled self-help groups are often cautious about giving outside
supporters too much power. You must develop a careful balance between
self-reliance and appropriate affiliation with people who can wield influence
on your behalf.
You can have the best of both worlds. One effective technique is
establishing a special task force such as an Honourary Board, a Committee of
Friends or even a legally separate foundation.
This allows people to assist in fundraising and other important tasks. The
actual power to control the organization can remain completely separate. The
special group reports to the board of directors and is responsible to them.
Will this take too long? It may take several years to fully build an
effective Honorary Board that includes the people you want most. Each year, new
appointees can introduce you into more influential circles, climbing the ladder
one rung at a time. In the interim, it can still be a very effective tool.
The social problems faced by grassroots groups and disabled persons today
are likely to remain an issue into the distant future. Current members, staff
and boards may all move on to other concerns while the organization survives to
serve new generations. Beginning now to develop circles of contacts will have
an immediate impact on income. At the same time, you will build the foundations
for the future.
Making the approach
Know your mission
Summarize your mission in two sentences. If you can't, spend a day with your
board trying to refine it. You may need outside help on this, whether a
professional fundraiser who has helped others develop mission statements, a
talented writer, or just a good facilitator who can listen with fresh attention
and provide feed-back.
A mission is not how you do what you do, but why. What is your purpose? What
will the outcome be?
A corporation evaluating a proposal looks at three things:
1)What is the organization trying to do?
2)How is the organization structured? Who is on the board, or acting as an
advisor?
3)What is the specific request?
The introductory letter
An introductory letter should be on the top of any proposal. It should be
clear and concise in one page. This is difficult, but important. A good
business writing course may help you pare out the non-essentials.
Summarize your key points here and make it exciting. Busy grants officers
seldom have time to read the whole application before deciding to reject it or
keep it for further consideration.
In one page, the letter should show:
[] purpose
[] need
[] successes
[] results expected from the project
[] what you are requesting
[] how you will follow up
It is a little like writing a poem. You get the important things said,
indicate that there is more to say, and make people eager to read more.
Jim Rennie of Gulf Canada Resources Limited put it this way: Donation
requests don't need to be glossy packages, but they do need to be complete and
professional. Any size group can put together a good request cover
letter, info on group, why money is requested, others sources of funding,
financial statements or budgets, etc. This material is essential if a group
wants to be seriously considered for funding.
There has been a trend lately to using one individual's personal story as an
example to get attention and sympathy. That has been so overworked in corporate
fundraising that it often turns off donation officers (although it still works
well in mass market appeals like direct mail).
An example of a particularly awful request letter appears on the next page.
The name and home town of the organization have been obliterated to protect the
guilty. The marginal comments show the reaction of the corporate donation
officer who received it. Needless to say, their application was turned down.
Actual example from a corporate donation officer's file:
WORST CORPORATE LETTER AWARD
(Actual example from a corporate donation officer's file)
October, 1985.
Public Relations/Charitable Donations Committee
Dear Sir/Madam:
Re: Foundation Donation
This letter is being sent to you because you get money out of XXXXXXXX. We a
now asking you to give some back.
The XXXXXXXX, (a registered charity - - all donations are fully tax
deductible) was set up about a year ago to raise money, invest it, and pay the
income to the XXXXXXXX Public Library. The Library presently gets most of its
money from provincial and Municipal grants, which are inadequate for the
Library s expansion and development.
Local support of the Foundation has been good - over $5,000 since our
Inaugral Meeting in March 1985. However, since our goal is $670,000 in ten
years, we know we must broaden our support-base by calling on the Corporate
community. Our contacts include not only suppliers such as yourself, but also
Corporations such as Bell Canada, which do business with our community every
day.
We intend to publish the names of all Corporate donors (unless, of course,
you wish to remain anonymous). Our apologies for the "form-letter"
nature of this communication. We are trying to keep costs down. Except for
postage and paper, all other expenses (of office space, office equipment,
secretarial time, etc.) have been donated. We will happily provide you with
more information if you wish.
Please repay to XXXXXXXX some of the money which you have received. It is a
worthwhile cause, and will be much appreciated.
Yours truly,
XXXXXXX
Trustee
The Meeting
Try to arrange a meeting with the donations officer to present your
proposal. This is not always possible, of course, either because it is too far
for you to travel, or because the donations officer doesn't see anyone.
If you can arrange a meeting, make sure a board member of your organization
is there, and takes a lead role. A staff member alone, even an executive
director, is not sufficient. A few donation officers refuse to give to
organizations that don't bring a board member, because they believe the board
should take an active interest in fundraising. If a board member can't be
mobilized for 15 minutes to meet a potential funder, they believe the
organization is in deep trouble.
Bring an information package that provides further details about your
project and the organization. This can be left behind if the donations officer
wants to give your proposal more serious consideration.
Try to sell your specific request, not the concept of giving money away in
general. Don't spend all your time talking; listen actively, too. Discuss the
project with the donations officer. Ask for feedback and suggestions. If the
donor becomes involved, you are more likely to get a larger gift.
Make specific plans to follow up on your visit. Don't just say We hope
to hear from you. Say: We'll call you the week of such and such, if
that fits with your schedule.
The Proposal
What goes into a good written proposal?
A clear problem statement. What is the societal problem this grant
will help solve? Provide statistics and human interest stories that document
the value of your project. Provide a needs assessment. Quantify, justify and
prove.
A workable solution. Show that you can fix the problem.
- What are your objectives?
- What population group will benefit?
- What methods will you use?
- Will the project have impact beyond the immediate results? If the method
you are testing is of interest to groups in other areas, it increases the
importance.
- How will the outcome be measured and evaluated? Evaluation procedures are
increasingly important to potential funders.
Proof that you have an able team. Show that you have the right people
to implement this expensive undertaking.
- What are the qualifications of the team members? List relevant degrees,
jobs and life experience.
- Will the reputation of the board members impress the donor? Give their
names and short biographical notes.
- Do you have endorsements? These should come from the people you are
helping, first and foremost. Professionals with impressive credentials who can
attest to the value of your work are next. Support from other organizations
that refer people to you are good. Endorsement by a respect ed business leader,
especially one who has given your group money, helps a lot. Letters from
politicians are probably the least useful; they seem to send them to anybody.
Extract the best quotes onto a single page instead of copying a stack of
separate letters.
- Press clippings on your group, or on the issue are also useful in an info
kit. They give a certain third-party credibility.
An affordable budget.
- How much is required overall?
- How much do you expect this funder to give?
- What exactly will this donation do?
- What is your overall financial situation, including revenue sources and
expenses. Include an audited statement.
- Who else are you approaching for donations?
- Is this a one-time request, or will you require additional funding in
future?
- How will the project be funded in future?
A connection to the funder. Show that you understand this funder's
unique interests.
Rejection letters
Follow up on rejection. When companies reply, Our funds are committed
for this year, they are often open to an application next year. Check it
out and follow up.
Most companies are so flooded with requests they do not respond at all to
those whom they will not help. Many have a policy of automatically discarding
(without reply) any form letters that are addressed Dear Friend.
If the company writes back to tell you that available funds are allocated
for this year, please check back with them. Ask when to re-apply. Their letter
may be a polite way of saying `no'. It might also be a genuine expression of
regret that the funds are committed. If the latter is the case, it would be a
shame not to re-apply at the right time.
If you receive a rejection that is worded in a friendly manner, you may wish
to contact the donations officer and ask for any suggestions he or she might be
able to offer. Ask if there is a better way to approach that company. Ask if
there are other companies that might be more appropriate.
Drop a short note to any company that has rejected you, thanking them for
the time it took to consider your proposal. In the future you may want to
re-apply. Begin cultivating a good relationship with them early.
Keep a record of all those who turn you down and those who give. Note what
you asked for and how you asked. Careful analysis may reveal patterns that can
help you improve your batting average.
Sponsorships and cause-related marketing
Sponsorships are hotly debated in both the corporate sector and the
nonprofit sector.
`Sponsorship' has a precise meaning: it is a commercial relationship in
which both the company and the nonprofit benefit. McDonald's, gas stations,
American Express, McCain Foods, and many other companies have tried these.
There are various other techniques that do not provide a direct return to
the company, but enhance its image by publicly supporting a charity. That is
called cause-related marketing. Here are examples of cause-related marketing:
- A corporation acts as host of a particular special event for you, paying
part or all costs.
- A company adapts the idea of being Official Sponsor of The Olympic
Games to being Official Sponsor of _________ . One
internationally known courier agreed to provide thousands of dollars worth of
free deliveries for a charity's Rolls Royce raffle and earned the title
Official Courier of the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation.
- Sketchley's Cleaners offered to clean and repair any used coats customers
would donate to charity, and collected thousands of Coats for Kids.
They also got good publicity and new customers. Other cleaners felt left out.
- On a simpler level, an airline will give free tickets to be raffled off, if
it feels they will get enough publicity among potential travellers.
Nonprofit groups benefit from the substantial amount of money available, and
increased public awareness thanks to the corporation's capability for
marketing. This can also give you leverage with other funding bodies. Finally,
it means a more involved relationship with the funder than a routine exchange
of proposal and cheque. It opens the door to better relations.
For the corporation, the best thing is that the publicity provides an extra
reason to give to the community. Many corporations have to grapple with the
question of why they spend any of their profits on donations at all. Levi
Strauss & Co (Canada) has given to charities since it was founded in the
1800s, and many people still ask why. There may be sound philosophical
arguments about good corporate citizenship, but in hard economic times,
sponsorship is more methodical and measurable.
Against sponsorship are concerns about the effect on traditional corporate
giving. First, it may leave out the small nonprofits, those that are
low-profile, and groups involved in controversial causes. Many of these groups
are on the cutting edge of new social issues. If they are left out, society
could suffer. Arts and sports groups are doing very well, but most nonprofits
aren't as well positioned.
Caution also has to be exercised to ensure the group supports the
corporation. Do you use their products? Would public disclosure of a link
between your group and the corporation cause embarrassment for either side?
- An international courier company about to provide thousands of dollars to a
charity changed its mind at the last minute. The charity sent urgently needed
documents via the courier's chief rival.
- A coffee company was planning to support an arts group, until an executive
touring the facility noticed the receptionist drinking from a mug with a
competitor's logo on it.
- One centre for teenage mothers, was desperate for start-up money in its
early years. Nestlé offered them full funding for five years. At the
time Nestlé was being boycotted by groups for the way it promoted infant
feeding formulas in Third World markets. The charity had a tough choice, and
ultimately decided to turn down the funding.
Sponsorship can also cause confusion: Is the money coming out of a
contributions budget or a marketing budget? If it is coming out of marketing
that may change how the success of a donations program will be measured in the
long term.
It can also lead to questions from the public over the purpose of the
relationship. People have wondered if Ronald McDonald House is part of
McDonald's Restaurants or a separate charity. In fact, it is separate, and most
of the money has come from other sources. The House has had difficulties lining
up other sponsors.
Ultimately, a company that has its identity wrapped up in a specific
nonprofit group may even want to assume more control to protect its good name
and its investment if the group becomes involved in a controversy.
There may even be a public backlash if they feel that a charity is being
exploited, or that a corporation is spending more publicizing its gift than on
the gift itself.
If you decide to go ahead despite the problems, be very clear about your
expectations of what you will receive. You are selling an opportunity to the
corporations to provide visibility and enhance their image. A different
corporate department may make the decision, and a different approach may be
needed.
Be sure you know all the strings that are attached. Are there restrictions
on what other nonprofit groups and corporations can be brought in as partners?
Do you have a signed contract? What are the provisions for your right to
approve how your organization's name is used by the company? How will problems
be resolved?
Know what your price is. What do other groups charge for similar marketing
opportunities? How little will you accept? What are the opportunity costs (if
any) of associating yourself with this particular company, in terms of lost
chances to work with other companies and lost donations from angry consumers?
Biggest sponsors
| Life insurance |
$2.55 million |
| Banks |
$2.5 million |
| Transport/communication |
$1.9 million |
| Petroleum |
$1.2 million |
Source: Idpar
Where sponsorship dollars were spent
| Sports |
47.4% |
| Performing arts |
19.6% |
| Art exhibitions |
5.6% |
| Other arts |
5.0% |
| Other events |
21.3% |
Source: Idpar
|