Project Outcomes

The participants overall reaction to the program was positive. Several of the participants registered with a construction-related labour union that will help support them to find work in the industry. There are two recommendations to address this cost. First, use a local representative if one is available or, second, have participants come to Winnipeg for the training.

Conclusion

This rural pilot tested the five-day program successfully, which shows that this training can be appropriate in a rural location. The opportunities for work are limited locally, and so participants may require additional resources in order to travel to worksites outside the community. There are logistical challenges in coordinating equipment and training, and the primary need for workers is in the urban areas. It should be considered that this training and an assessment process can be made available in key locations and those wishing to be assessed for employment could travel to the key location closest to them. This approach is practical in the way the labour market hires construction workers. For example this program and assessment could be available in places like The Pas, Thompson, Brandon, Selkirk, and Winnipeg. Any job seekers in Manitoba could travel to the closest centre for assessment and job information. Instructors and equipment are available in these larger centres and far less expensive and more practical than moving it.

On a final note, it would be beneficial going forward to ensure Employer support of these programs. If there is truly a labour market need, it would be easy for local employers to support the assessment process, and they can access qualified workers quickly and efficiently.