Nutritional Analysis
| |
Serving Size |
Calories |
Protein (g) |
Carbo- hydrates (g) |
Total Fat (g) |
Saturated Fat (g) |
Mono- unsaturated Fat (g) |
Poly- unsaturated Fat (g) |
Sodium (mg) |
Cholesterol (mg) |
| Sandwiches |
| Hamburger | 102 g | 255 | 12 | 30 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 37 | 490 |
| Cheeseburger | 116 g | 305 | 15 | 30 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 50 | 725 |
| Quarter Pounder® | 166 g | 410 | 23 | 34 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 85 | 645 |
| Quarter Pounder® w/Cheese | 194 g | 510 | 28 | 34 | 28 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 115 | 1110 |
| McLean Deluxe™ | 206 g | 320 | 22 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 60 | 670 |
| McLean Deluxe™ w/Cheese | 219 g | 370 | 24 | 35 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 75 | 890 |
| Big Mac® | 215 g | 500 | 25 | 42 | 26 | 16 | 1 | 9 | 100 | 890 |
| Filet-O-Fish® | 141 g | 370 | 14 | 38 | 18 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 50 | 730 |
| McChicken® | 187 g | 415 | 19 | 39 | 19 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 50 | 830 |
| French Fries |
| Small French Fries | 68 g | 220 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 2.5 | 0 | 110 |
| Medium French Fries | 97 g | 320 | 4 | 36 | 17 | 12 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 150 |
| Large French Fries | 122 g | 400 | 6 | 46 | 22 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 200 |
| Salads |
| Chef Salad | 265 g | 170 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 111 | 400 |
| Garden Salad | 189 g | 50 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 65 | 70 |
| Chunky Chicken Salad | 255 g | 150 | 25 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 78 | 230 |
| Side Salad | 106 g | 30 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 33 | 35 |
| Croutons | 11 g | 50 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 140 |
| Bacon Bits | 3 g | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 95 |
| Soft Drinks |
| | Coca-Cola Classic® | diet Coke® | Sprite® |
| | Small | Medium | Large | Jumbo | Small | Medium | Large | Jumbo | Small | Medium | Large | Jumbo |
| Calories | 140 | 190 | 260 | 380 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 140 | 190 | 260 | 380 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 38 | 50 | 70 | 101 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 36 | 48 | 66 | 96 |
| Sodium (mg) | 15 | 20 | 25 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 40 |
Evaluating the contribution of the variables to task difficulty
As with the prose and document scales, IRT was used to establish the quantitative
literacy scale as well as to characterize tasks along it. Again, a response probability of
80% was used as an indicator that someone at a specified point on the quantitative
literacy scale has mastered or is proficient with tasks at that place on the scale. It does
not mean that they cannot perform tasks above their estimated proficiency; rather, they
may do so, but with less consistency. Their expected consistency on tasks above their
level of proficiency depends on how far the task is from their estimated proficiency.
|