4.2 Complexity factors in the ALL survey

The above literature review suggests that a framework of factors affecting the complexity of numeracy tasks should not only address factors related to the numerical and textual aspects of tasks, but should also address other issues. It should treat separately the number of operations and the type of operations from the type of mathematical (or statistical) information to be processed, which may involve numbers explicitly but also other types of mathematical information. In so doing, the desired framework of complexity factors should take into account the broad scope of the definition of numeracy, i.e., reflect the variation within contexts, the range of mathematical ideas/content, the types of possible responses, and the types of representations that cut across adult life contexts.

With the above considerations in mind, five key factors have been identified that are predicted to affect, separately and in interaction, the difficulty level of numeracy tasks to be used in the ALL survey. These five "complexity factors" are outlined in Table 2 and are organized in two sets: two factors that address mainly textual aspects of tasks, and three factors that address the mathematical aspects of tasks. These five factors are listed separately for clarity of presentation, but in actuality are not independent of each other and do interact in complex ways. Each factor is examined in some detail below, followed by a later subsection that describes the calculation of an overall complexity level for each item, taking into account all five factors.

Table 2:
Complexity factors—Overview
Aspects Category Range
Textual aspects 1. Type of match/problem transparency Obvious/explicit to embedded/hidden
2. Plausibility of distractors No distractors to several distractors
Mathematical aspects 3. Complexity of Mathematical information/data Concrete/simple to abstract/complex
4. Type of operation/skill Simple to complex
5. Expected number of operations One to many

Type of Match/Problem Transparency. This is a combination of the factor of Problem Transparency outlined above, and of an IALS factor called Type of Match. Problem Transparency is a function of how well the mathematical information and tasks are specified and includes aspects such as how apparently the procedure is set out, how explicitly the values are stated, etc. Type of Match refers to the process that a respondent has to use to relate the requested action in the question to the information in the task or text, which can range from a simple action of locating or matching to more complex actions that require the respondent to perform a number of searches through the information given. This measure of complexity for a numeracy task incorporates the degree of text embeddedness of the mathematical information.