Three interviews were scheduled and conducted with each family. Arrangements
made in advance proved to be not appropriate since the parents did not cancel
appointments if something arose and would indicate that they had forgotten
the planned meeting when questioned later. Most of the parents preferred
that the interviews occur immediately after the telephone call was made.
Long term planning appeared to be difficult for all of the parents.
Since
family members often experience activities differently (Snow et al, 1991),
in the four families where there was more than one caregiver, I invited
both to be interviewed. Doug was present when Beth was interviewed (Case
4) and
John (Case 2) was interviewed after Lynne. Both Robert (Case 6) and Allen
(Case 7) declined. During the interviews, I often probed for more details
to get clarification on points that were not well understood. The interviews
were audiotaped and then transcribed for inclusion in the data analysis.
I also noted my observations and recorded my comments in field notes.
Interview 1.
Overview
Preliminary data were gathered to obtain an account of the family's literacy
practices and events, parental attitudes and beliefs towards literacy, and
the conditions influencing these practices. An "interview guide" approach
to naturalistic interviewing starts with a list of issues to be addressed
by each participant, still allowing for other topics to emerge, specific
to each
participant (Patton, 1990). A conversational style allowed me to present
the new questions while maintaining the flow of the interview. |