I have shown how literacy is much more than reading and writing and how it is intertwined not only with education, but also health and social welfare. In the interactive model, this is illustrated by the triangle crossing into the outer circle which includes a place for the social conditions mentioned. All children should have the opportunity to be exposed to a variety of discourses in order to learn more about themselves and the world. However, children who lack the literacy skills that mainstream children learn as a matter of course in their habitus and social environments are not only at a disadvantage because of their lack of facility with these skills but they seldom get to use the literacy skills that they possess. In other words, low–income children will have more difficulty when
there is a mismatch between the literacy skills learned in formal schooled
literacy
and the literate ways that they have been shown at home. Furthermore, what
this model suggests is that those working in the literacy field should
carefully
examine the gate–keeping role in how mastery is defined. Hence, researchers
should also work on defining what mastery means since mastery will result
in the accumulation of cultural capital. If by mastery, we refer only to
what is commonly considered print literacy or skills–based literacies,
which Kelly (1997) describes as In Kelly's opinion, what is needed is a shift towards multiple literacies
that go beyond a skills-based approach to consider sociocultural contexts,
including those of popular culture and multimedia, in order |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page |