A gap remains in the knowledge base on the impact of information technology
on learning in low–income families who have no access to devices such as
computers at home. None of the children from the low–income families in my
study had personal computers at their home to help facilitate their learning.
In contrast, many of the children from higher socioeconomic classes had access
to personal computers and the Internet and often spoke at school about using
their computer. Their skill in being able to readily use the classroom computer
far exceeded the lower–class students because of their experiences with their
system at home.
Conclusions
This study adds to the research base for family literacy. The family
literacy practices that I have put forth adopt a broad definition of literacy
as a
vehicle for communication and learning and for people to gain greater
control of their lives. Briefly, the research has added to the book of knowledge
about literacy in low–income families in New Brunswick. The points will
be summarized here. First, school literacy was limited to helping with
homework
and listening to oral reading. Incidental learning opportunities were
typically not recognized by the families. The purchase of items to foster
school
literacy
appeared to be limited, although the parents perceived by their standards
that they were buying educational items for their children. While the
schools attempted to extend home–school relations, many of the parents were
uncomfortable
participating in school activities. For those parents who took part,
they often discontinued their involvement due to other commitments. Finally,
changes to social policy and access to transportation would not automatically
translate
to more literacy activities and accumulation of cultural capital.
I pointed
out the multifaceted aspect of family literacy and the danger in using
a deficit model and generalizing about literacy needs of low–income families.
Avoidance of a deficit framework will continue to be a challenge. However,
a shift is clearly needed to move thinking away from looking at the
learner as the problem with a deficit in skills, and to look at the socially
framed
nature of the problem. Although income still defines these families,
new and different possibilities were shown for constructing their identity
and
may affect their attitudes, values and orientation to literacy. Critical
theory helps to shift us from looking at economics as the primary cause
of social development to institutions and culture itself. |