|
Heath (1983) describes the many functional ways that literacy is used by
adults and their children. She shows how differences in language and culture
between students' home and school settings make academic success at school
difficult. She expresses concern about the Heath concluded that when literacy in the home is at variance with the school, it could contribute to low school achievement. For instance, unlike the Roadville parents, Trackton parents did not typically buy toys or books for their children, nor create reading or writing tasks for them, or model reading or writing themselves. Heath found that some other ways that the mainstream Roadville parents support their children's literacy development include asking them questions, engaging them in conversations, reading bedtime stories to them, surrounding them with print and remaining an active volunteer at school. When the Roadville children started school, their home and school worlds
were a better match than the Trackton children because of their socialization
to literate ways of the school. That is, the environment in which they grew
up allowed them to use language in the manner expected at school. In contrast,
the Trackton children who were well-prepared for life in their own community,
were confused when teachers asked hypothetical questions or ones in which
the teacher knew the answer. They reacted strangely at school and many soon
learned to tune out because their form of language was not promoted at school.
Upon recognition that the beliefs and styles of interaction of the children
differed from the townspeople, Heath (1983) then recommended a program to |
| Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page |