Assessing the Complexity of Literacy Tasks Presentation 
black line image

Slide 8

Average probability of responding correctly (RP 80)

Profiency level 1 2 3 4
People's
Graphic of an arrow
Scores
200
(0-225)
250
(226-275)
300
(276-325)
350
(326-375)
Task Complexity
Graphic of an arrow
%
1 72 94 99 100
2 50 82 95 99
3 20 49 79 94
4 12 31 60 83
5 1 3 13 41

The IALS has developed a method of measuring the probability of successfully completing literacy tasks.

To get a level four, you would have to consistently perform level four tasks correctly 80% of the time. This means that individuals who have achieved a particular literacy level will consistently perform tasks at their level with an 80% probability of success. It also means they will have a greater than 80% chance of successfully performing lower level tasks. It does not mean, however, that individuals with low proficiency can never succeed at more difficult tasks. They may do so some of the time but their probability of success is relatively low. In other words, the more difficult a task relative to a proficiency level, the lower the likelihood of a correct response.

The above chart shows the probability of individuals with different literacy levels consistently responding correctly to tasks with various degrees of difficulty. For example, an individual with a proficiency score of 200 at level 1 on the document scale would only have a 20% chance of understanding and completing level 3 tasks and only a 12% chance of successfully understanding and completing level 4 tasks. On the other hand, a person performing at level 4 is expected to be able to perform level 1, 2, and 3 tasks with a high probability of success. However, the same person would only have 41% probability of successfully performing level 5 tasks.

Slide 9

Benefits

green box graphic Provides a tool to:
  green arrow graphic manage the level of complexity of public documents (predictive tool); and
  green arrow graphic match it to the ability of the target population (profile approach)
   
green box graphic Complements plain language
   
green box graphic Fills a gap in assessing readability and usability


black line image
Previous page Table of contents Next page