Positive Strategies for Managing Change ~ Results
- Political environment - changes in government or as a result of government
influence
- Knowledge - changes in the amount and type of information
available
Using H.L. Leavitt's research as a base, Martin identifies four key organizational
variables that can be affected by external or internal change pressures.
- People
- Programs
- Structure
- Technology
Martin (2001) contends that a change to one of these variables can also result in an
impact to one or more of the other variables as the organization tries to address the
changes. Additionally, using a change matrix, he argues that change can be
experienced in one of four different ways, depending on the impact of the change and
the level of planning the organization uses to address the change.
Scale of impact |
 |
Fracturing |
Crisis - unexpected and serious change to the
organization (e.g., a chance occurrence such as the destruction of a
building by a storm or earthquake) |
Strategic - major changes that are planned in advance
(e.g., restructuring the organization in light of proposed government changes) |
Adaptive |
Surprise - changes that are unplanned and minor
in impact (e.g., a minor supplier of materials goes out of business) |
Incremental - minor changes that are anticipated (e.g.,
adjusting a workspace to accommodate new computer equipment) |
|
Unplanned |
Planned |
 |
Degree of Planning |
Impact of change on the individual
As Martin (2001) indicates, it is not surprising that most people resent changes
at work because it "invariably means having to take on more work, stress or even
losing one's job, hardly positive reward for accepting change. "
Scott and Jaffe (1995) argue that even positive changes can elicit feelings of stress
because the individual is going through the process of leaving the familiar environment
and entering one that is unfamiliar. Bridges (1988) contends that people go through
a three-stage process when they experience significant change.
|