The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) carried out in 1994, defined literacy as –
The ability of adults to use written information to function
in society, to achieve their goals, and to develop their knowledge and potential.
These and other definitions consider literacy in the context of the need
to communicate and function in one's personal, social, community and work
environment. They suggest that the attainment of literacy skills is dependent
on one's personal goals, aspirations and potential and therefore, differs
from individual to individual. Other definitions are found in Appendix
3.
4. Literacy Profile
4.1 Canada and the International Adult Literacy Survey
- In June 2000, Statistics Canada and the Organization for Economic
Co–operation and Development (OECD) released the final report from the
groundbreaking 1994 International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS). The first
international survey of its kind, IALS provides a comparison of literacy levels
across nations, languages and cultures. Canada and 19 other countries participated in the survey.
- IALS identified and measured three types of literacy:
- Prose Literacy – the ability to understand and use information
from texts such as news stories or fiction;
- Document Literacy – the ability to find and use information from documents such as maps or
tables; and
- Quantitative Literacy – the ability to make calculations with
numbers imbedded in text, as in balancing a chequebook.
Canadians' Literacy Levels
IALS measured proficiency at five different levels within each literacy
type. Here is how Canadians, ages 16 and older, measured up in prose literacy:
- 22% of Canadians were at level 1. These people have difficulty reading
and have few basic skills or strategies for decoding and working with text. Generally, they are
aware that they have a literacy problem.
- 26% of Canadians were at level 2. These are people with limited skills who read but do not read well. Canadians at this
level can deal only with material that is simple and clearly laid out.
People at this level often do not recognize their limitations.
|