Table 6 (continued)
Information Sketch of 31 Auding-Reading Transfer Studies
Reference Subjects Duration of Instruction (hours) Did Training Result in Auding Improvement? Was a Significant Transfer Effect Found?
Marsden, W.W. 1951 5th & 6th graders (N = 232) 9 Not measured Yes
Matthews, Sister J.L. 1958 3rd graders (N = 230) 24 Yes No
Merson, E.M. 1961 4th graders ? Yes No
Prater, H.M. 1965 4th graders (N =59) 14 Yes Yes
Raper, K.A. 1951 6th graders (N = 30) 2 No No
Reddin, E. 1968 4th, 5th & 6th graders(N = 381) 18 Not measured No
Reeves, H.R. 1965 4th graders (N = 444) 7 1/2 No No
Skiffington, J.S. 1965 8th graders (N =153) 11 1/2 Yes Yes
Taylor, H.S. 1964 3rd graders (N =48) 40 ? Yes
Thorn, E.A. 1968 1st graders (N = 132) ? Yes Yes
(p = .06)
Veronese, J.P. 1960 9th graders (N = 44) 9 1/2 Yes Yes
Withrow, E.M. 1950 7th, 8th & 9th graders, disadvantaged readers (N = 62) 27 1/2 Not measured No
Wygand, L. 1966 3rd graders (N = 56) 7 1/2 Not measured No

Seven studies (Feldmann, et al., 1968; Hollingsworth, 1964; Lewis, 1963; Madden, 1959; Matthews, 1958; Raper, 1951; Reeves, 1965) failed to achieve a significant improvement in auding ability in their training programs, and, not surprisingly, found no improvement in reading ability. While such results are not incompatible with the transfer hypothesis, they do not constitute positive demonstrations of the transferability of training between auding and reading.