It is impossible to total the figures on enrollments and expenditures
that are available, because so much data is absent, and so much of what
is available clearly consists of over- or under-estimates. It seems,
however, plausible to conjecture that in 1989-90, total provincial
and territorial expenditures on literacy programming (0-8 equivalent
or distinctive If literacy programs do not serve all they might, are they at least
secure? Pessimists might even doubt whether current programming increases
are here to stay. Literacy advocates generally know that multi-year
core funding of programs is essential to allow them to consolidate and
expand their work, and that project funding is also crucial to enable
developmental activities to be undertaken. But they also know that,
historically, programs have often been underfunded or sporadically funded.
Temporary funding, and grants restricted to Even with recent programming expansion and policy development, most mandates for literacy work are stated only in plans, policies and strategies; these have some weight in committing governments to act, and in at least two provinces they describe literacy as a right. However, these commitments are not as deeply entrenched as they would be if stated in legislative or judicial definitions of adults' right to basic education. Only Québec has legislation giving adults the right to complete elementary and secondary schooling (administratively, Québec establishes a learner entitlement to 2,000 hours of literacy instruction). In all other provinces and territories, school legislation limits the right to education to children and adolescents. A right to literacy could also be judicially decided, perhaps as an age equity issue under the Charter of Rights. The Canadian Alliance for Literacy has discussed raising a legal challenge, but no action beyond a survey of provincial legislation has been taken.137 |
136 There are also non-governmental literacy funding sources. Business, labour, and community organizations provide space and administrative supports for programs, and some businesses provide workers with paid time for study. Some philanthropies support programs and materials development. Non-governmental support is clearly substantial, but no accounting system allows it to be quantified. And of course these "partnerships"and "contributions"do not and should not supplant the centrality of governmental support. 137 For related discussion, see Brad Munro, "Human Rights and Literacy,"Tesl Talk 19:1, 1989, 80-5. |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page |