With regard to programming forms, the term "community-based"
is itself used in different ways in different circumstances. This variety
of usages in part represents pedagogical or political differences. And
in part it represents different regional traditions in adult education.
Sometimes "community-based" designates programs on
the basis of formal or structural characteristics. Non-profit independent
literacy organizations with their own boards of directors are usually
called community-based. The term is also applied to programs with links
to other local governmental and non-governmental agencies, or programs
that use volunteer tutors from the community they serve.
But more strongly, the term "community-based" designates
substantive links of programs to communities, or control of programs
by communities, in ways that go beyond structural arrangements. Programs
in urban areas may be located in store-front settings or in public spaces
such as community centres or libraries, and programs in rural areas
with low population densities may use itinerant tutors or teachers.
Some programs are directly operated by the organizations (e.g., trade
unions, community centres) of which potential students are members.
Some programs go beyond "public awareness" or publicity
activities, and engage with neighbourhood networks to attract potential
learners; francophone literacy organizations, for example, often combine
awareness-building with program planning and student recruitment by
conducting door-to-door surveys of learning needs and obstacles to study
in French (especially outside Québec).
One Recommendation in the "Declaration from the Toronto Seminar"
states that "Funding institutions must recognize and respect
the autonomy of community-based literacy groups to determine the content,
methodology and administration of their programs." 173
The Regroupement des Groupes Populaires en Alphabétisation du
Québec defines popular literacy groups in various ways, firstly
that they are "politically, educationally and administratively
independent." 174 In practice, as argued above, autonomy and independence
depend upon what institutional arrangements define the space in which
programs work. They depend upon the ways in which governments devolve
authority and resources to programs, or keep programs on a short tether.
|