The anchors of illiteracy

In an industrialized society with nearly universal elementary schooling, and nearly ubiquitous print, it is reasonable to ask what keeps literacy from developing, what holds illiteracy down — the metaphorical "anchors" of illiteracy.

Among the anchors of illiteracy are the limited availability of literacy programs, and barriers to participation in them. The costs of study — such as tuition, transportation, foregone wages — are frequently obstacles for potential learners. Women in particular must often cope with inadequate child care, lack of transportation (especially in suburban and rural areas), and the burden of doing two jobs a day. Women's male partners sometimes resist their efforts to further their education.188 Some government programs help overcome these barriers. For example, some programs offer arrangements for childcare; some are tuition free; some offer stipends. But such supports are not universal. Standards should be devised for such programs of assistance, and the adequacy of existing measures assessed.

School and society

Education systems that continually leave children and youth with limited literacy are another of the anchors of illiteracy. Although school attendance is compulsory from age 6 or 7 to age 15 or 16 in different provinces and territories, not all students develop literacy skills. It is difficult to know how many students leave school each year with notably limited literacy skill. The Statistics Canada survey shows that 6% of 16-24 year olds are at levels 1 and 2 of reading ability. A Canadian Teachers' Federation survey of public found that teachers now say that 18% of students they deal with have "basic" literacy difficulties — e.g., with regard to reading, "understanding word meanings and concepts presented in uncomplicated contexts," as appropriate to a grade level.189 It is often asserted that about one-third of students leave school before obtaining a diploma.


188 At least one study found single mothers of young children, and middle-aged women, underrepresented in literacy programs; see Hindle, Literacy Learning in Saskatchewan, 89.
189 Wendy K. Warren, Ruth Rees, RossAnn Edwards (Social Program Evaluation Group, Queen's University), Teachers and Literacy, Ottawa, Canadian Teachers' Federation, 1991, 40.