|
Models for Integrated Family
Programming The family support model, or family resource model, and the family literacy model support learning skills for both parent and child. Considerable research indicates a powerful link between the education level of parents, particularly mothers, and the learning success of their children. It is also important to recognize the cyclical nature of social problems such as poverty, low educational levels and poor health, and how providing support to families can help to break the cycle. Successful family services do not target or label participants or identify their priorities; programs are open to all and participants identify their own needs and issues. Literacy B.C. is currently engaged in producing a Framework for Best Practices in Family Literacy which should be available after April, 2000. The need for stable, secure funding is critical. The term "drive-by funding" was used to describe how programs may be in a funder's sights for a short period, then left to survive on their own. A successful program that has overcome this predicament and become self-sustaining is Families in Motion, Chilliwack, British Columbia. The Peel-Halton-Dufferin Adult Learning Network can be found at:
www.phdaln.on.ca. Impact on Women Learners of Employment
Insurance and Related Changes Ursule reminded participants of the growing global trend in polarization between rich and poor. Within this trend is the development of a larger and larger class of low skilled, low paid people whose job is to work for the small percentage of those who are higher paid. More and more human aspects of society are being disengaged to technology. Politically, these trends can be viewed as an anti-democratic thrust against humans in favor of corporations as the basic and defining component of society. Despite various in-roads in recent decades, the picture of women's employment is still gloomy:
Though there is still much lip service devoted to gender equity, Ursule reported that most of the 300 recommendations in the federal government's plan for Gender Equality do not contain much substance. Changes to E.I. have meant that fewer women are eligible. There has been a 20% drop in the number of women whose E.I. claims are successful; consequently fewer women can access training that is E.I. sponsored. In addition to which, all other entry points to government programs have been removed. Less access to E.I. and to E.I. sponsored training result in pressure for women to take low paying jobs. The bias in the new labour agreements between the federal government and the provinces is towards those who are most employable and against those who face many or multiple barriers to employment. Ursule Critoph can be contacted at: ucritoph@istar.ca. |
| Back | Contents | Next |