|
Project: Women, Learning, and
Disabilities Prepared by Jane Larimer
Women with Physical
Disabilities At CCLOW's conference, Penny Leclair was very
articulate in describing her dilemma. As a woman with disabilities, she is
expected to be either as outstanding as Helen Keller or to live her life
quietly, without education or expectation. She faces many barriers in her
desire to be an educated woman. Many of these are as a result of systemic
discrimination in education and training policies and practices. There is a
tremendous need for policy analysis and advocacy in this area and CCLOW's
mandate would allow it to address these issues. For example, it would be useful
to pull together previously developed recommendations for changes within these
systems, and to advocate for their implementation.
Women with Learning Disabilities
Women with learning disabilities, similarly, face tremendous
barriers to receiving an education. Working with Learning Disabilities
Associations across Canada, CCLOW may have the opportunity to promote findings
and advocate for improved practice in the field. Again, this work clearly falls
under the organization's mandate.
|
Recommendation
CCLOW should:
|
|
Analyze government education and training
policies and practices and their impact on women with disabilities. This
analysis should highlight how these policies leave many women with disabilities
without the most basic education. Based on the analysis, the CCLOW should
advocate for improved policies and practices. |
Related work includes:
- Establishing a clearinghouse of information related to
women's education and training issues, which would include information on women
with disabilities.
- Articulating best practice models in a women-positive
context, and
- Providing a forum for discussion and analysis of issues
Conclusion There was
significant interest among the conference participants in ensuring that this
specific work was undertaken. It appears that much of the primary research
(e.g., issue identification, data gathering, issue formulation, recommendation
development) has already been done. What is now required is that the voices of
women with disabilities be heard, rather than ignored. CCLOW was seen as a
potential advocate for this work.
|