1. Technological changes did not have a substantial negative impact on the number of women in the Clerical area in the past Decade:
  • The Clerical area has continued to grow through the 1976-1985 time period. As more and more women entered the workforce, this sector has become more exclusively female (women represented 75% of clerical workers in 1975, 79% in 1985).

    However, the content of Clerical jobs may well have changed. As data become. available, the concern that some Clerical jobs are being "de-skilled" will have to be determined.
  1. Representation in unions had increased to 35% by 1981 among women who work full-time but remained at a low 15% (1981) among women who work part-time.*

  2. The earnings of women, though marginally closer to those of men in 1985 than they were in 1975, are still very much lower than the earnings of men:
  • In 1975, women earned 64% of what men earned, when both worked full time. By 1985, this had increased only to 68%.

  • The fact that the wage disparity has narrowed only slightly is true for women with all levels of education except for those who have a post-secondary certificate or diploma.

  • As of 1980, only university educated women in the 45-54 year age range earned more than the average male worker.
  1. Since many more women than men are part-time workers, the disparity in yearly earnings between women and men is even greater when all workers are considered. By this calculation, women workers earned 44% of the yearly earnings of men in 1975 and 55% of men's yearly earnings in 1985.

  2. The value of part-time work compared to full-time work is gradually increasing, but is still well below that of full-time work.
  • During the 1975-1984 time period, the earnings of women who work part-time increased relatively more than the earnings of male part-time workers or the full-time earnings of either men or women.

  • The small amount of data available* indicate that few part-time jobs offer pro-rated benefits.
  1. The monetary value of traditional "women's" work (relative to the work traditionally done by men in the same general occupational category) does not appear to have increased from 1970 to 1980.

  2. Low family income level is, of course, highly related to whether the income earner is male or female. However, this effect is exacerbated by low levels of education.

  3. The low income level of female-headed families shows no sign of declining. Half of all female-headed families have incomes in the lowest 20% of family incomes. However, since there are more female-headed families than there were at the beginning of the Decade, the dimensions of this problem are increasing.

* White, J. Women and Part-Time Work (1983).



Back Contents Next