WORKSHOPS

Centralization vs. Decentralization of Information

Moderator:
Aisla Thomson, Program
Coordinator, CRIAW

Panelists:
Margaret Benston, Computing
Science and Women's Studies,
Simon Fraser University

Ann Hall, Dept. of Physical
Education, University of Alberta

Rosella Melanson, Information
Director, New Brunswick Advisory
Council on the Status of Women

Participants in the workshop examined the advantages and disadvantages of centralization vs. decentralization of information. At first, decentralization appears more democratic, since it broadens access to information. A women's data base could be decentralized amongst women's organizations, but accessible to all women's groups. Applied to business, however, it is feared that decentralization could lead to restrictive and punitive measures in evaluating performance through monitoring the number of keystrokes, the length of telephone conversations, or the frequency of interruptions for women working in their homes.

Among the main issues that were raised are, who controls information; who owns the machines; and what uses are intended by those who own the computers. The use of computerized information for social control is central to the debate on centralization vs. decentralization.

Action:

• To stay informed on the monies granted to Telidon by the Canadian government.

• To use the computer to enhance the women's movement.

• To be better informed on such questions as the distribution and control of information.

• To train for managerial positions in the public and private sectors.