Transforming Mathematics Pedagogy By Pat Rogers Listen to a woman groping for language in which to express what is on her mind, sensing that the terms of academic discourse are not her language, trying to cut down her thought to the dimensions of a discourse not intended for her." (1)
This paper is personal. It tells the story of my efforts to transform my teaming from practices whim silenced and Rogers disempowered my students to a pedagogy aimed at engaging them actively in the production of mathematical knowledge. Reflecting on my own experiences in undergraduate mathematics and on doing mathematical research has been a forceful impetus for changing my own practice. More recently, however, my efforts have gained momentum from research which shows that it is possible for women to excel in mathematics taught by male teachers without experiencing the negative consequences of learning in a patriarchal environment (2). It shows that. when the style of teaching is true to the nature of mathematical inquiry and the environment is genuinely open to and supportive of all students, women are attracted to mathematics and are just as successful as men. When I first started teaching I reproduced those practices I had observed as a student: I lectured. Believing that teaching at the post-secondary level involved the transmission of knowledge and insight from me (the "expert") to the students (the "novices"), I saw my job as "exposing" the students to the material of the course. I administered tests in order to measure achievement and to rank students in relation to their peers. Each class had a natural pattern: I introduced the topic, covered the blackboard with formulas and mathematical language, and worked a few problems. I asked some questions, and even elicited some answers (though usually from the same three of four-male--students) and assigned homework. I was considered successful. In my course evaluations, students praised me for my enthusiasm, organization, the clarity of my exposition, my knowledge of the material and my accessibility. On the final examination many students failed or wrote such incomprehensible statements that I wondered if we had all been attending the same course. How could they do so badly when I had explained the material so well?
|
Back | Contents | Next |