Numerous attempts to conduct prevention programs in schools suffer from major flaws.

Traditionally, schools have assumed responsibility for preparing young people for their roles in society. The Ontario Ministry of Education states that its overall purpose is "helping individual learners to achieve their potential in physical, intellectual, emotional, social, cultural and moral development." Within this broad mandate is a commitment to the whole child and to the development of students' social competence, feelings of well- being, and self-confidence. For students who are victims of family violence, the school environment can provide an alternate reality that challenges beliefs from home such as that "violence is a way to solve problems," or "I am unlovable."

There have already been numerous attempts to conduct prevention programs in the schools but most programs in existence suffer from major flaws. Most have been developed outside the school environment, many by shelters and women's coalitions, for example. Often the lessons emphasize only one issue and are not linked to what the teacher is doing either through curriculum or classroom experiences. These programs may be used in the short term by a highly motivated teacher but have poor staying power, and there is no continuous program that extends across the school years.

The approach for the development of the Family Violence Prevention Program in Hamilton-Wentworth is grass-roots, working with school staff in their own environment. The emerging program is continually shaped by the real needs of students, teachers, administrators and parents. It is being developed at three levels: primary/junior (including kindergarten to grade 6); intermediate (including grades 7 and 8); and secondary (including grades 9 through to OAC - Ontario Academic Credits, formerly grade 13).

The initial development occurred at the Intermediate level during the 1990-91 school year. Working closely with the staff, our aim was to experience and fully understand their concerns, challenges and needs in order to carry out a family violence prevention program and integrate it into the teacher's curriculum and into the fabric of the school. Disclosure of abuse, for example, was one of the issues for which staff expressed much concern. They were anxious about how they would react to a child who was telling a story of abuse, and how they could be helpful when they might be feeling shock, disgust, and anger. Teachers had real fears of revictimizing these children by saying or doing the wrong things.

Critical Learning's
The work during the 1990-91 school year produced a number of significant discoveries. In particular, we defined six areas in which children need to be given knowledge, skills, and attitudes in order to prevent family violence through their own empowerment: Family Violence Awareness (raising awareness that there is violence in some families, that violence is condoned in society, that there are no appropriate or allowable victims); Personal Safety (understanding that some situations are not safe, that problem-solving strategies which avoid harm can be developed, that there are community resources available for assistance); Communications Skills (development of congruent expression of verbal and non-verbal messages, development of assertiveness, active listening, and conflict resolution skills); Healthy Relationships (gaining an awareness of the components of a healthy relationship, using social skills to develop healthy relationships); Self-Esteem (helping students to recognize and appreciate their own worth); and Prevention of Stereotyping (recognizing stereotyping and its effects, learning to value individual uniqueness). These critical learning's provide a foundation for the development of a program that can begin in kindergarten and build to OAC.

Staff Team Work
The school planning process is an important ingredient for success. Teachers tend to work in isolation, rarely inviting another teacher into their classroom. In planning the first family violence unit, teachers came together to share concerns about the topic and identify their own learning needs. As they began to consider how they would communicate these issues to their students, they brainstormed strategies, shared ideas and resources and many ended up working in pairs to present certain content.

  1. From Dr. Peter Jaffe, Susan Kaye Wilson, and David Wolfe, Children of Battered Women, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990.

One of the strongest features of our approach is that the family violence learning's are integrated with mandated curriculum. So that, for example, a math class might learn about grids and percentages by charting the frequency of wife assault in Canada. Al- though initially teachers may have discomfort about their understanding of family violence, they are experts in their own subject area. Using these areas provides teachers with a sense of security and competence that enables them to take risks in planning a program for the prevention of family violence. The integration with mandated curriculum also assists teachers in evaluating students' learning during the unit and removes any appearance that what is happening is superficial or unimportant learning.



Back Contents Next