The innovative aspects of the program include the fact that they reflect a true collaboration between Canadian academic institutions and key employers. They have also been designed to ensure that students who have committed years to their field of study do not feel they have to accept the first job offer and can focus on identifying which position will allow them to best begin their career.
11. Funding Mechanisms Please describe the type of funding mechanism used for this initiative (e.g. provider’s own budget, service contract, grant, co-funding etc.)

This program is completely funded through the CACEE operating budget.

12. Organizational Dimensions

 Please describe any key organizational dimensions of this initiative, e.g. delivery mechanisms, number of trainers, reporting structure etc.

Delivery mechanism included introduction of the revised Guidelines at the 2007 CACEE National Conference in June; inclusion on the front page of the CACEE website; distribution of print copies to CACEE members; inclusion in the CACEE Connect Newsletter.
13. Partnerships Integral or Related Are there any partner organizations involved in the delivery of the initiative? If so, please provide brief details of the partnership arrangements. CACEE members
14. Stakeholder Involvement What mechanisms are used, if any, to involve key stakeholders involved in the development, delivery or evaluation of the initiative? Which groups of stakeholders are involved? The development of the revised CACEE Ethical Recruitment Guidelines began in December of 2006 with a meeting of representatives from financial institutions and career centre staff from top business schools in Ontario. Representatives at this meeting included CACEE and non-CACEE members. At this meeting current challenges were identified from both the employer and educator perspectives. This consultation process continued at the December ON Regional Conference. A specific Working Group was established by CACEE. This group identified appropriate deadlines. The deadlines were then forwarded to the CACEE Ethics Committee for input and further development. The CACEE Board of Directors then approved the final revision.