13. Partnerships Integral or Related

 Are there any partner organizations involved in the delivery of the initiative? If so, please provide brief details of the partnership arrangements. Student Affairs and Services (including the Counselling Centre) Alumni Affairs Registrar’s Office Government of NL – “Getting the Message Out” Program

14. Stakeholder Involvement

 What mechanisms are used, if any, to involve key stakeholders involved in the development, delivery or evaluation of the initiative? Which groups of stakeholders are involved?

25. Evaluation feedback will assess the impact of the experience from the point of view of all stakeholders - students, faculty, staff, Dean of Arts, and Student Affairs and Services. It will also be critical to ensure that students continue to have a key role in the planning of the program and to identify potential obstacles.

26. The program was evaluated after a focus group of six students and will be further evaluated after pilot with 10 students.
15. Key Changes Over Time Have there been any major changes in the content or delivery of this initiative over time? If yes, please give brief details.  
16. Performance Indicators What indicators are used, if any, to measure the performance of this program?  
17. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms; Reporting What arrangements are there, if any, for the monitoring and evaluation of this program and for reporting on the results?

27. Participant feedback is critical to implementation and therefore learners should be involved in this process. ArtsWorks is based on the premise of student involvement throughout all levels of program development as appropriate.

28. Following the implementation phase at the end of the 2007-2008 academic year participants will be invited to participate in an evaluation in the form of an on-line program evaluation survey as an additional method that participants can use to provide feedback. This quantitative evaluation will measure student learning outcomes to assess the group learning that resulted from the program.

29. As Phase 3 of the program involves the participation of faculty members, it will be necessary to evaluate responses from the faculty members who are involved as cohort team leaders and service-learning team leaders. Group reflection and individual interviews will be the primary qualitative methods while individual paper survey instruments and on-line surveys will be the quantitative methods.

30. An executive summary including a complete program summary of phase one to three, findings, and recommendations will accompany the data analysis. The next phase will involve a presentation to all department heads within the Faculty of Arts and the department of Career Development & Experiential Learning who will also be invited to provide feedback to program managers and the respective deans.