Each member should review the training proposal using the selected standards and rating system. Once complete, the committee should meet and discuss the ratings until concurrence is reached. Results should be recorded so that if there is an appeal, the process is transparent and can be communicated.
The following standards are adapted from Future Ed (1996), ETS (2005) Project Based Training Checklist (G. Langlais) and Oars training Inc. (2003). To fully implement standards, the partners will need to select which of the following suggested purchase of training standards they hope to apply to the review process and what level of evidence is acceptable for each.
Recommended Provincial Standards for Purchasing HEO Training |
The Proposed Training provides… |
Yes or No |
Rating out of 10 |
Not applicable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Clear need for training development or delivery should be identified and verified. |
1.1 a response to a Government issued RFP. 1.2 a response to a Government sought after partnership. |
|||
2. ETS should be contacted to consider the development or delivery of training. |
2.1 a clear plan for proposal development. 2.2 evidence of key partners, their roles and support needs. 2.3 verification of partner commitment prior to funding approval. 2.4 other partners who may be involved in funding or co-funding the program |