Berg and colleagues (Berg and Calderone, 1994; Sansone and Berg, 1993) asked
preschoolers, teenagers, college students, and older adults to describe a recent problem
(hassle, conflict, challenge, and so on) that they had experienced and to describe the
problem in as much detail as possible. The intent was to investigate whether the types
of domains of problems remain constant across development or whether different types
of problems would appear for different age groups. The researchers found significant
variation in the content of everyday problems across development. The everyday
problem-solving content for 5-6-year-olds consisted predominantly of problems dealing
with family (e.g., disagreements with family members) and assigned responsibilities
(e.g., home chores). For 11 to 12-year-olds, everyday life problems centered on school
and after-school activities and environments. No single content area dominated the
everyday life of college students, and their salient problems had to do with free time,
work, friends, family, and romantic relationships. Finally, the everyday problem solving
of the older adults centered on the family context and health.
Barker (1978) suggested that the content of practical problem solving is determined
by the ecological characteristics of a given developmental period. They carried out detailed
observations of settings inhabited and experienced by elementary school children on a
daily basis and found that children most frequently occupy settings embedded in
schooling and family life. This piece of work is unique in terms of its thoroughness and
attention to details; however, based on sporadic evidence accumulated in research on
developmental life tasks, the general assumption in the field is that the content of the
practical problem solving of adults differs in a variety of ways across the life span. In
other words, it might be impossible to carry out Baker et al.-like studies in all ecological
settings encountered in adulthood, but it might be possible to target the few that
appear to be crucial at specific developmental periods. Specifically, it has been shown
that (1) college students' tasks are primarily aimed at succeeding academically, forming
social networks, developing an identity, and separating from family (Cantor, Norem,
Neidenthal, Langston, and Brower, 1987); (2) adults focus on a variety of tasks, ranging
from starting a family and a career in young adulthood, through the pragmatic tasks of
middle adulthood, to adapting to impairments of health and adjusting to retirement
during old and advanced old age (Baltes et al., 1984; Havinghurst, 1972; Neugarten
Moore, and Lowe, 1968).
1.2.3 Goals of practical problem solving
The goal-directedness (e.g., Goodnow, 1986; Scribner, 1986; Wertsch, 1985) of practical
problem solving is one of the most often cited characteristics of practical cognition in
application. Therefore, the second line of research concerns the developmental trajectories
of goals of practical problem solving.
Strough, Berg, and Sansone (1996) showed that there is developmental variation
in the types of goals underlying everyday problem solving. The profile of this
developmental variation reflects developmental life tasks (Cantor, 1990). Specifically,
preadolescents reported more goals for task improvement, and a large portion of their
problems involved the school context. Interpersonal goals appeared to be more salient
to middle-aged adults than to preadolescents. Preadolescents, however, reported more
other-focused assistance-recruiting goals than did adults. Older and middle-aged adults
reported more physical goals than did younger individuals, and the adult group as a
whole reported more affective goals than did preadolescents.
|