Figure 1
Comparison of skills lists, part III
|
National council on vocational qualifications core skills |
Essential skills research project |
Communication |
|
|
Speaking |
Communication |
Oral communication |
Listening |
Communication |
Oral communication |
Reading |
Communication |
Textual Reading |
|
|
Use of documents |
Writing |
Communication |
Writing |
Mathematical |
Application of Number |
Numeracy skills |
Problem solving |
Problem-solving |
Problem solving, Decision making, Planning/ Organizing Job Tasks |
Intrapersonal |
|
|
Motivation |
|
|
Metacognition |
Improving own learning and performance |
Continuous learning |
Interpersonal |
|
|
Teamwork |
Working with Others |
Working with Others |
Leadership |
|
|
Technology |
Information Technology |
Computer Skills |
Not included |
|
Psychomotor Skills |
Only the Michigan Employability Skills Profile and the SCANS Workplace
Know-How have a significant number of items that do not have a clear
place within the ALL
categories. A few, such as "develop career plans" and "pay attention
to
details" in
the Michigan Employability Skills Profile, would seem to be separate skills.
Several others,
however, appear to involve skills from a combination of the categories in our
list. For
example, "identify and suggest new ways to get the job done" from the Michigan
Employability Skills Profile might incorporate a combination of problem solving,
teamwork, and communication. Thus, these skills are not necessarily missing from
the
ALL model; rather, they might require a restructuring of the categories.
Overall, the ALL skill categories do seem to accommodate the skills identified by
the documents that were chosen to be examined and, would do so for most any other
skills list found in the employability skill literature. However, it can not be claimed that
the combined list is complete. There may very well be other skills or competencies not
identified by any of these efforts. If future efforts identify missing elements, then the
model should be open to refinement, but the consistency among these studies gives
enough confidence to proceed. A more likely shortcoming than omission is that a simple
list of skills does not necessarily provide a sufficient degree of depth for a sophisticated
understanding of life skills or a useful system of assessments. Therefore, the resulting
set of life skill categories was treated as a first step in building an overarching framework
of life skills.
|