|
The "burdensome stakes" are high in Australia where at least one regulator strongly encourages some organizations to test the clarity of some of their documentsfor example, the Corporations Act 2001 requires financial organizations to produce Product Disclosure Statements for each product the organization sells. The law requires those documents to be " presented in a clear, concise and effective manner."34 That's not so unusual. But in the explanatory material35 for the legislation, the regulator, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (which is the Australian equivalent of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission) suggests that organizations test documents on consumers to ensure that the documents are truly clear and that they really meet the legislative requirements. This encouragement to test is a potentially onerous but, even so, a legitimate requirement. After all, it's easy to say "our documents are in plain language"it's rather like when someone says "the cheque's in the mail". But no one can really be sure a document is clear unless a sample audience has confirmed that they can use the document to find, to understand, and to use the information they seek. 7.2 The opportunities and promise Plain language can also be seen in a positive way, for some organizations plain language is:
So for law firms, plain language can be wonderful in 3 ways: as a product, as a value adding part of the experience of buying legal services from the firm, and as a distinguishing feature that clients value.
|
| Previous page | Table of Contents | Next page |