- Another firm,
Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Australia's largest law firm and winner of "Best
Australian Law Firm" in 2001) recently prepared consulting and support services
agreements for Microsoft in plain language. Those documents are now being used
as a model for Microsoft's services agreements in many countries.
Mallesons Stephen
Jaques and Phillips Fox have been working hard on the plain-language front
since the early 1990s. In those days they were breaking new ground. Now, many
other Australian law firms are active in relation to plain languageall of
them would at least claim to write in plain language.
This development
in Australian law firms seems likely to be a sign of things to come. After all,
today, commercial clients of Australian law firms are prepared to pay for legal
services that are plain. One day, clients everywhere will refuse to pay for
legal services unless they are plain.
It's worth
dwelling on these developments for a moment.
5.4 Plain-language
wins the debate and kicks on in law firms and in legislation
As far as I know,
this development in Australian law firms is not common in other countries.
Also, in the countries other than Australia where law firms are developing
plain-language expertise, they seem to be doing so in response to regulatory
demandrather than seeing plain language as an opportunity to provide a
new service for clients. For example, major commercial law firms in the US are
equipping themselves to write documents that meet the plain-language
requirements of the SEC regulations.
The history is
very different in Australia where law firms adopted and committed to plain
language in response to client demand.
In Australia,
clients started demanding plain-language documents as soon as the legal
profession fell silent in its debate with the plain-language movement (as it
was!) about the incompatibility of clarity on the one hand with accuracy,
certainty, and precision on the other hand. That debate was lead, on the
plain-language side, by the Law Reform Commission of Victoria under the
direction of its Chairman David St L Kelly.
The Commission
published a discussion paper and 2 reports on plain language.12
|
12
|
LEGISLATION
LEGAL RIGHTS AND PLAIN ENGLISH, Discussion Paper No. 1 (August 1986); PLAIN
ENGLISH AND THE LAW, Report No. 9 (repr. 1990). ACCESS TO THE LAW: THE
STRUCTURE AND FORMAT OF LEGISLATION, Report No. 33 (May 1990). |
|