| MB: |
Um, a couple
of things again. First of all, as I said one of the original movements or
groups that got on the plain language train was the legal community, realizing
just what you've said, David. When a decision is handed down or communicated to
the person affected by it, it's all couched in subsections and classes and lots
of different paragraphs and, again there needs to be more of a focus on what
the result is, or what the specific outcome is for the person who's being
affected. There are a lot of lawyers I know, fortunately, who do not only do
that in their own practice, but also advise others to and set out guidelines
for how to communicate certain decisions. And they've even tested them; they
tested one version of a decision--actually, we had a world premiere of the
study by a gentleman named Joe Kimble from the states. They actually
field-tested a decision being handed down: one in plain language and the other
in the usual legal terms. And appreciably more people were able to understand
the second version that was written in plain language.
So, don't
give up hope -- there is much more push for this in the legal community, and
there are a lot more people who are starting to become aware of that need. And
like what you said, if there's, you know, another attachment or piece of paper
that sort of focuses on, or gives a summary of the main things that are in that
longer bit, then you're not assuming that people can't understand that longer,
more complicated language, but you're giving them a choice. And that's really
what the law should be about. |
| DS: |
Well David
earlier on I was talking about the tax guides, and if I'm not mistaken what
they did--because ya know the tax experts were saying "Well we could be on the
hook here if somebody treats this as the gospel truth."--I think there are
warnings all the way through the tax guide saying "This is just a guide. If you
want the real, unadulterated truth refer to the 800-page Income Tax Act. So,
that's how they get around it. So in a sense the tax department has done
exactly what you have suggested that lawyers do.
Cathy in
Ottawa--Hi Cathy! |
| Cathy: |
Any car
dealership or car leasing company where you actually have to go in and sign
your life away for the next four to five years, and then they start sending you
letters saying "Oh, by the way, this is the information that we failed to give
you" and you don't understand the information. So you end up calling their
1-800 number and sitting on the phone for 45 minutes, just so they can say "Oh.
That wasn't supposed to be in there." |