2.

The goal of adult basic education programs is to credential participants. This is

generally expressed as "providing an opportunity to complete one's education" Such goals are generally viewed as a priority by participants more often than by service-providers. In terms of outcomes, this goal has illusory success. The credentials obtained through academic upgrading, no matter how we describe them or promote them, are never precisely equivalent to those obtained through the regular elementary-secondary system. The credentials obtained through BTSD programs, when they lead directly to occupational training programs, are valid for those programs but may not be acceptable in other post-secondary programs.
 
3.

Adult basic education programs assist participants to solve immediate functional

or instrumental goals (eg. obtaining a driver's license; improving communication between parents and the child's school). This is listed as an important priority for many basic literacy and ESL participants. They tend to express this goal in personal terms such as .... "I want to be able to do what others do" or "my children are ashamed of me when I can't understand their teacher". These are highly individualistic needs and are not viewed as a priority by the service-provider. In terms of outcomes, this goal is very often successful and generally leads to further participation for long-range or expressive goals. Such immediate goals are of relatively low importance to academic upgrading participants since the nature of their participation requires some notion of a long-range goal (i.e. finishing my schooling, getting a job).
 
4.

Adult basic education programs are to help participants improve their ability to

contribute to society. The service-provider generally views this as contribution through employment and economic participation for both men and women; and as political participation for men but domestic and child welfare participation for women However, women tend to interpret this goal in terms of improving their own lot in life by improving the conditions in which they live and work. Defining contributions to a society in two different ways sets up conflicts in the goals of the programs which also appear in the processes and resources used.

In one Unesco study, (1) 27% of the countries surveyed viewed literacy programs for women as providing an advantage to the family and to child care; while only 12% of the women in these same countries viewed this goal as a priority for them. The goal implies societal judgments of what constitutes "good participation" and out of these implies judgments comes the process and content of the programs themselves. Programs which do not conform to these judgments and learners who deviate from these norms will not belong tolerated. The outcome is that adult basic education programs tend to form the basis of political education which conforms to the politics of the controlling group in the society. Education of adults which leads to conformity is equally unacceptable since individuals view their own situation as unique and as not necessarily requiring conforming behavior.

The Declaration of Peresopolis, drawn up by the International Symposium for Literacy and addressed to the member nations of Unesco, states that: (2)

(The Symposium)... considered literacy to be not just the process of learning the skills of reading, writing and arithmetic, but a contribution to the liberation of man and to his full development. Thus conceived, literacy creates the conditions for the acquisition of a critical consciousness of the contradictions of society in which man lives and of its aims; it also stimulates initiative and his participation in the creation of projects capable of acting upon the world, of transforming it, and of defining the aims of an authentic human development ... Literacy is not an end in itself. It is a fundamental human right....

Literacy work, like education in general, is a political act. It is not neutral, for the act of revealing social reality in order to transform it, or of concealing it in order to preserve it, is political ....

Experience has shown that literacy can bring about the alienation of the individual by integrating him in an order established without his consent ....

Literacy is effective to the extent that the people to whom it is addressed, in particular women and the least privileged groups..., feel the need for it in order to meet their most essential requirements, in particular the need to take part in the decisions of the community to which they belong.

Literacy is therefore inseparable from participation, which is at once its purpose and its condition. The illiterate should not be the object but the subject of the process whereby he becomes literate ....



(1). J. Chabaud, The education and advancement of women, (Paris: Unesco, 1970) ,p.109

(2). Final Report, International Symposium for Literacy, Peresopolis, Iran, September 1975, "The Declaration of Peresopolis", pp. 35 - 38. Available from the International Co-ordination Secretariat for Literacy, Paris.



Back Contents Next