1. HOW MANY SPACES EXIST, AND WHAT NUMBER HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE FOR WOMEN? IN WHAT LENGTH AND TYPE OF PROGRAMS ARE THEY?

    Through the National Training Act it is possible for each region to set target numbers of women for enrolment in their institutional and industrial training programs. As part of the Women's Employment Strategy Plan of Action 1983-84 each region has been asked (a) to set targets for the number of women to be trained in non-traditional occupations under the WINTO element of the National Industrial Program in both GIT and CTST, (b) to set targets for the number of female trainee starts in institutional training courses non-traditional for women, (c) to set aside 30% of the seats on all skill and technical courses identified as non-traditional for women, and (d) to set aside 30% of available BTSD seats for women who require upgrading to enter non-traditional training. This 30% target is an increase over the 20% target suggested earlier this year. However, in Nova Scotia for example, only 20% of non-traditional job training places were designated for priority referral of women, and a few other provinces are reserving slightly less than 30%. Since the numbers of women taking up these priority training spaces have so far proven to be fewer than the number of reserved spaces, reserving less than 30% of non-traditional occupational training spaces is not presently a problem.

    The goals of the National Training program include a 42% overall participation rate for female trainees, and a 30% participation rate for female trainees in non-traditional areas. In the 1983-84 fiscal year, regions will be expected to raise their rate of female participation in training for non-traditional occupations by 5%. This means, for example, that in Manitoba where last year the female participation rate in non-traditional training areas was 8.6%, this year the rate must rise to 13.6%.

    One must keep in mind that the overall female participation rates mayor may not include apprenticeship program figures, which greatly affect the final numbers. The definition of a non-traditional occupation for women is generally taken to mean any occupation in which less than 10% of the workers are women. There was some hope expressed by a few Women's Co-ordinators that this definition may soon be enlarged to include jobs where less than 20% of the workers are women.

  2. HOW MANY OF THESE SET-ASIDE SEATS HAVE BEEN FILLED? WHAT HAPPENS TO THE UNFILLED TRAINING SPACES?

    Although it was very difficult to fill all set-aside seats last year, things seem to be improving slightly this year. The greatest lament from all sources is "women don't want it". It is at this point that all the job market strategies, all the affirmative action initiatives, and all the goals and targets and quotas come unstuck. Women are simply not clamoring for non-traditional training or jobs. As one community college counsellor put it, "a forty year old woman entering the labor force after twenty years of house-cleaning and child-rearing, simply cannot visualize herself as a crane operator or a diesel mechanic". Even if she does contemplate a non-traditional occupation, she must cope with the pressures from family, friends, neighbors who will find it hard to accept her in a new and non-traditional role.

    When women do not take up the training places reserved for them, these places return to the general pool of training places. In most regions, the unfilled spaces become available to other applicants on the waiting list two or three weeks before commencement of the course. As one respondent described the procedure, "Other eligible clients are contacted to avoid non-utilization of the training opportunity." It is still to be seen whether unfilled reserved spaces will mean fewer training spaces set aside for women in the following year.


Back Contents Next