The need for curriculum development

Many women had expressed an interest in following up this research project with some work on woman-positive curriculum development. Diane Eastman (Brandon Friendship Centre) and Wanita Koczka (Pine Grove Correctional Centre) went through the documentation, highlighting the different ways in which women had worked with curriculum over the last year.

Point one. Write it the way you would say it.

This point brings up the issue of different language for different purposes. We discussed how we talk to each other, the words we use when we talk to each other, and how we alter the speech pattern when speaking to different people. For example, we do not talk to a doctor in the same way that we talk to our friends. We use different words even when we are talking about the same thing to each of them.

In the same way, we have more than one writing style. We would make sure everything is absolutely correct on a letter to a potential employer. However, we would not care if a few commas were missing in a letter to a friend. In the first case, a business letter is being written and an impression is being made. In the second case, you are writing a letter to someone who knows you and is not going to be making decisions about you based on missing commas.

The brochure is being used by AMAC as an introduction of themselves to people who might wish to access their services. It should be inviting and warm should give information, but not overwhelm the reader. It should be personal." words that the women chose to rewrite the brochure reflect this.

While dealing with this step we covered vocabulary, dictionary skills establish word meaning), context, use of the thesaurus (synonyms), and spelling. We also talked about why a conversational tone and the use of the word "you" would make the brochure more personal and inviting to a potential client.

Point two. Use short words and sentences.

This item led us into discussions about what constitutes a short word and a short sentence. The group decided that a short word should contain more than two syllables. They agreed that there were some three syllable words that would not present a problem to a beginning reader, but words with one or two syllables should be used whenever possible. This decision reached only after the group found out about syllables and how they join together to make words.

Fogg's Readability Scale was introduced to the group. We discussed what was and why it was useful. The women decided that they did not want to become expert at using the scale because they couldn't see where it would be useful to them. They did say that knowing how the scale works helped them to understand why some material is harder to read.

At Pine Grove, for example La Vera Schiele talked about the importance of acknowledging how women want to begin with their own reality rather than something standardized in a text book. The instructor cannot understand the reality, however, unless she has managed to negotiate a relations of trust with her students. Once that is in place, curriculum develop becomes much more possible. Both she and the students then have the opportunity to learn as they share their experiences.

Diane Eastman (Brandon Friendship Centre) had included curriculum guide in an appendix) the policy paper she wrote out of her experience in the research. She showed how women in her group identified their interest - re-write a pamphlet for a service agency works with adults molested as children - and how she worked with that interest to cover topics such as vocabulary, spelling, syllables, sentence structure, sequencing, and summarizing.

Several women used their journals to keep track of their curriculum development. Anne Moore (Action Read), Karen Bergman-Illnik (Arctic College), Paula Davies and Mary Ann Tierney (College of New Caledonia), and Nancy Steel (Keyano College) developed an almost week-by-week description of how they worked with women in their very different programs. As mentioned earlier, however, those journals never became public documentation. When they talked about their discoveries later that day, they recommended that all of that learning be recovered so we can share our wide variety of woman-positive approaches.

This is a page from the appendix to Diane Eastman's policy paper. Here she outlines how she developed curriculum out of women decision to rewrite a brochure for a service agency.



Back Contents Next