|
1.1 On Voice
|
"Formulate policies that you think will achieve some of
the changes, and continue working with civil servants and politicians to try to
get those implemented, accepted, introduced whatever the first and next steps
are. I know you're doing this; I think it's an important function." |
(interviewee)
It is clear for instance, that CCLOW has been most influential
in those situations in which it has taken a clear and focused position on a
particular issue and then has supported that position with high quality
independent research. It is not only feminists within government but also other
national women's organizations which rely on CCLOW to provide just this kind of
leadership. Although some regionally-based groups, such as WETC (Women's
Education & Training Coalition) in British Columbia and ACTEW (Association
for Community-based Training & Employment for Women) in Ontario are doing
some excellent advocacy work in the policy area, our survey of policy positions
taken by other organizations regarding women's education and training revealed
that they had surprisingly little to say (7). Our interviews confirmed that
other organizations look to CCLOW to take the initiative and to provide
guidance with respect to identifying which issues are most in need of current
attention; what position ought to be taken on those issues; and to whom
lobbying efforts ought to be addressed.
This latter element - - "to whom" - - requires additional
comment. Although the federal government role with respect to education and
training for women is still a strong one, it is changing. Privatization and
federal-provincial agreements mean that the federal role is becoming
increasingly 'hands-off'. If organizations like CCLOW wish to continue to speak
with a clear and well-heard voice they will need to develop some new strategies
for influencing policy at the regional level and within the private sector.
1.2 On Vision
|
"You're asking me for my vision? ... My vision... What
exactly did you say you were going to use this for? |
(interviewee)
Another factor of relevance to this study has to do with the
importance of clear vision. The visioning process conceiving a desirable future
is never an easy one. Within institutions there are strong additional
disincentives to such long-term and conceptual efforts, not the least of which
is the potential of being 'written off' by one's co-workers. Within
governments, political time lines and a strong preference for incremental
decision-making leave little time for thinking about a future which may never
come. Yet vision is a highly practical tool and an essential element of the
policy-making process. It provides an organizational framework for
priority-setting and for action, an antidote for ad-hoc and crisis-response
decision-making and the fragmentation of effort that follows, and a source of
ongoing motivation and inspiration. A sense of shared vision engenders a
feeling of solidarity and mutual commitment that is an invaluable aid to
networking across long spaces of time and distance.
To look beyond immediate tasks to a desired future requires a
certain amount of courage. To go on to attempt to define clearly the essential
elements of that future on anything more than an individual basis requires not
only courage but also audacity. However, if CCLOW wishes to make maximum use of
its limited resources in the interests of the women it represents, the
organization must see clearly. It cannot be expected that this clear vision
will come from anywhere but within CCLOW itself, from the women who are its
members.
1.3 On Integrity
|
"We need to be able to stop not noticing what it doesn't
add up to ..." |
(interviewee)
CCLOW and organizations like it are most successful at
influencing policy when they adopt positions which are already familiar to the
public, close to conventional values and therefore relatively uncontroversial
and narrow in scope (8). What this frequently means in practice is a long
period of public education, some preliminary advocacy work which may range over
a number of related issues, and then a focused and specific effort -- what one
interviewee called "the laser beam approach". Yet the single most frequently
mentioned problem during our interviews was the need for comprehensive and
integrated action on issues related to equality. It is very important to create
an approach which allows for focused effort on specific issues within a much
broader and integrated context, in order to prevent fragmentation of effort
and/or co-optation by external interests. What is necessary is a comprehensive
and integrated analytical framework in which individual issues can be seen in
relationship with one another and reverberating impacts and requirements for
change can be assessed and identified.
In this study we have endeavored to make a contribution to each
of the areas discussed above. Our emphasis in gathering written information has
been on providing the background for a strong voice accurate, current
information gathered from regional and private sector sources as well as the
federal government. In the interviews, it has been on the development of vision
on identifying what the path to an ideal future might look like and what the
role of education and training can be in assisting us to find that path. In
analysis of the data we have tried to focus on integrity on placing identified
concerns and issues within a broader framework. In each area however, we are
able to make only a small contribution to a process which has been and will be
ongoing throughout CCLOW's history. |