|
Defining Management in a Worker Co-op Worker-owned
co-operatives are sometimes described as "self- managed." This reflects the
ownership structure that gives every member-worker equal access to control of
the business. In some small co-ops, management responsibilities are shared by
all the workers with decisions made by consensus. Other co-ops - usually those
with more than 10 members - have designated management personnel. In these
situations, co-op members (singly or in committee) may take on management roles
or the co-op may hire management from outside the membership. Whichever the
case, in a worker co-operative the management is accountable to the membership
who are the workers rather than to absent shareholders.
Accountability to the membership of the co-op means
that management serves the interests of the member-workers. It means that
managers carry out the policies and directions set by the members for the
business. It means that management decisions and performance in general are
evaluated by the members. It does not mean that the group holds a meeting every
time the office runs out of paper clips! It should not mean that every worker
is free to give direction to the manager or the management committee at any
point during the working day. Most co-ops establish guidelines for management
activity and accountability in their initial development stage, although this
may not prevent conflicts over typical management issues, such as, production
schedules or procedures.
Education and Training Needs Co-op members are
workers who need to think like owners. In addition to their daily work-load
they take part in making policy decisions about every aspect of the business,
from financial planning to technological innovations. This means they need to
be familiar with many technical aspects of business and to have overviews of
their own enterprise and of the industry in which they operate. Co-op members
also work and plan together. They need to feel confident about participating in
meetings as well as being informed about the issues. They need well-developed
skills for participation in decision-making and for resolving the conflicts
that will inevitably arise. In the spring and
summer of 1987, I had the opportunity to present a unique course for women in
co-operative enterprise training. My colleague Sandra Berman and I developed
and instructed the 26-week program at Douglas College in New Westminster,
British Columbia. Called Co-operative Employment For Women, the program was
funded by CEIC under its Job Re-Entry component. There were 19 full-time
participants, women who had been out of the paid workforce for at least the
previous three years. The program involved classroom training as well as
on-site experience in co-op sector work settings. Our goal was to address the
educational and training needs of potential worker co-operative members who had
varying levels of formal education, work experience and group participation
skills. The course was organized to integrate
personal and group skill development with training in the technical aspects of
co-operative business. The training was presented in nine blocks, alternating
work placement periods with classroom sessions. All participants received
"job-specific" training in basic computer skills, some participants received
additional training either in computer graphics or in food management,
depending on their work placement.
In a worker co-op, the management is
accountable to the membership who are the workers rather than to absent
shareholders.
|
The work placement component of the program involved a total of
14 weeks of on-site training. The co-operation of the work placements was a
critical factor in the success of this particular educational process. The
settings used were intentionally varied. They included a small worker-owned
bakery, a co-op restaurant, housing co-op resource groups, and a large credit
union central, among others. Placement contact people were enthusiastic from
the outset about participating in a program to promote education about the
co-op sector. The keystone of the program was the
Feasibility Project. In the first training block, participants divided into
small groups, each choosing a particular business idea; a computer teaching
service for home-based women and an artists' marketing network were two of the
ideas selected for further study. Participants were given the opportunity to
apply classroom and work placement learning by sifting their experience and new
information through the feasibility project. Reflecting the process a new co-op
group would follow, the project began with an emphasis on personal/group-
building skills and research into co-operative structures. As the program
proceeded various facets, such as Financial Planning and Legal Structure, were
examined and resolved. During the final week of the program, each group
presented its feasibility project and business plan to the group, in one case
complete with sound effects and in another with extensive computer graphics.
|