1. Women's vulnerable position in the economy is based on the sexual division of labor.

     * Women's vulnerable position in the economy is partly determined by her class position but even her class position is vulnerable since it often depends on her relationship to a man.
    * Women's responsibility for the care of children (and the lack of affordable quality childcare) means women working in the paid labor force who become pregnant have to make a decision about how and if they will continue working after their child is born. They may have to work part time or be under-employed, thus earning less than a living wage, becoming more prone to lay-offs and cutbacks.
     * Many women with children choose or are forced to choose not to work for pay at all thus becoming dependent on the state or a partner's income.

  1. All changes in the economy have different impacts on women and men.

    * When an economic crisis such as a recession causes a drop in family income, women's household management and service work increases because stretching the household budget and managing of family stress is considered women's work.
    * The introduction of micro technology to the workplace specifically changes the nature of the clerical and service work that is done, due to the sexual division of labor, largely by women.
    * Resource development such as offshore oil, logging and mineral extraction is often located away from settlements and family, thus the price of a paycheck for a man is often separation from family and community life.
     * Wherever or however economic booms and crises occur, women are responsible for managing its impact in the home and, to a large extent, in the community as well.

  1. The family is an economic as well as a social unit.

    * Government policies such as taxation, family allowance, pension and welfare are described as social policies but they also use the family as an economic unit. They are not static; they develop and change depending on government's socio-economic values, choices and priorities.

  1. The work women do to maintain family and household is of economic value.

    * One study estimates that for Canada, in 1981, the value of household work equaled between 35 - 40% of the gross national product (GNP: the added accumulation of the value of goods and services produced in a community) (5).

  1. Raising children is an economic activity that influences and is influenced by the economy.

     * When there is real choice to have children the decision is often based on a family's economic security.
    * Women's continued participation in the labor force after childbirth depends on family income, the possibility of employment and the availability, affordability and quality of childcare.
     * The quality of services affecting children, such as education, health, recreation and economic opportunity, varies by region depending on the socio-economic priorities and policies at all government levels, and many families have to make choices about where they live based on those quality of service issues.

  1. Everyone has the right to economic independence.

    * The basic components of economic independence are adequate shelter, food and an annual income above the poverty line. Equality of opportunity, a basic belief of Canadian society, implies that men and women have the same opportunities to use the tools needed to reach economic independence. These include appropriate education, job training, and support services such as affordable childcare and employment.
    We welcome discussion about the use of grounding assumptions, the process of developing them, and experiences in working with women on economic development. Please call or write the Women's Research Centre, #101, 2245 West Broadway, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6K 2E4, (604) 734-0485.

Diana Ellis works as a freelance consultant on women's issues, organizing skills and social animation and has been a member of the Women and Economy committee of the Women's Research Centre since its inception in 1976.


1. Women Against the Budget and Women's Research Centre,", The Exclusion of Women from Economic Planning", in Drache and Cameron (eds),
The Other Macdonald Report, Lorimer,
1985.
2. Northern British Columbia Women's Task Force, Report on Single Industry Communities. Women's Research Centre, Vancouver: 1977.
3. Women's Research Centre, Beyond the Pipeline. Women's Research Centre,
Vancouver: 1979.
4. Women's Research Centre, Women and the Economy Kit.
Women's Research Centre, Vancouver: 1986.
5. SJ. Wilson, Women, the Family and the Economy. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto:
1982, p. 62.



Back Contents Next