For most Canadian librarians, academic freedom is a right, as well as a responsibility, usually defined in their collective agreements, handbooks, or in their terms and conditions of employment. Academic freedom allows librarians to practice their profession unhindered by those in the community who would restrict or deny free access to information. As academic librarians we also have long defended the right of other members of the academy to the protection guaranteed by these principles. The Canadian Library Association statement of intellectual freedom says: "All persons in Canada have the fundamental right, as embodied in the nation's Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to have access to all expressions of knowledge, creativity and intellectual activity, and to express their thoughts publicly. This right to intellectual freedom, under the law, is essential to the health and development of Canadian society. Libraries have a basic responsibility for the development and maintenance of intellectual freedom. "It is the responsibility of libraries to guarantee and facilitate access to all expressions of knowledge and intellectual activity, including those which some elements of society may consider to be unconventional, unpopular or unacceptable. To this end, libraries shall acquire and make available the widest variety of materials." Hate literature is, of course, an issue for librarians. Collections of extremist literature which can be characterized as hate literature cannot be justified on the basis of a balanced collection. "Balance" applies to competing theories which are subject to debate, discussion and consideration. When literature denies historical fact it is not redressing a balance in discussion, but promoting a historical fiction. Collections dealing with factual matter (historical or otherwise) need to stand the test of accuracy or authoritativeness, or be identified in some way as historical error or invention.
Most Canadian academic librarians are fully committed to these
principles. What remains for us are the challenges, some of which can be
discerned in existing systemic barriers. These barriers disallow full
recognition and partnership to all those who would comprise an inclusive
university. Selection of Materials |
Back | Contents | Next |