Phase IV: The Case Study A
case study is usually a powerful tool because it allows the participants to
deal with important issues as outsiders thus removing the threatening aspect of
being too person- ally involved. Since it allows the person to relate to a
situation with a rational frame of mind, it is an appropriate instrument for
this type of process.
The objective of this phase is to create an environment in which
much of the information already presented in the first phase is brought
together with the intention of high-lighting issues, and suggesting solutions.
The content of the case study needs to be directed to the
requirements of the particular group. It might be written by the program
planners, a team from the workshop group, or it might be taken from material
already prepared. Short stories, newspaper and magazine features, films and
film strips are also good sources of case study material.
The case study takes place in small groups. Issues are raised;
solutions are suggested. The sharing of this information takes place in a large
group. This can be done in creative ways using role play, drawings, and panels.
Phase V: Where Do I Go From
Here? This phase involves a reflection period. "What is the most
essential thing for me to do?" is the important question. Participants are
encouraged to start personal journals. If appropriate, participants might share
ideas in small groups. They should leave the workshop with some plan of action.
This might take the form of an objective and a task analysis. It might involve
a plan for more personal reflection on the topic; selected readings might be
recommended; or a group action might be initiated.
Phase VI: What Have I Done? Am Doing? Hope
to Do? After a three/six-month period, participants can either
meet again or be contacted by mail. They are asked to reflect on their actions
over the past three/six months, to evaluate what they have done, and to make
some future plans. Opportunity for sharing should be provided. If the follow-up
is done by a meeting, this could take the form of small groups; if by mail, the
sharing could take place by means of a newsletter. The development of a network
system might also be suggested as a way to keep the process going.
The learning journey continues, hopefully, with a transformed
perspective.
It allows the participants
to deal with important issues thus removing the threatening
aspect of being too personally involved. |
|
Conclusion and Recommendations
The positive power of reflection is emphasized in this model. Women should
be encouraged to explore opportunities for reflection. These might include
learning to keep a journal, finding other people with whom they could share
reflection, or structuring time for reflection by themselves on a regular
basis. This latter might include a scheduled physical activity, such as
jogging, walking, or swimming, followed by a period of reflection (Boyd and
Fales, 1983).
The importance of the reflective ability is strongly supported
in the literature on experiential learning. Kolb and Fry (1975) point out in
their theory that learning is concerned with a four-stage cycle which includes
four abilities, one of these being reflective observation:
|
The experiential learning model depicts learning as a
process of conflict, confrontation, and resolution among four basic adaptive
modes or ways of relating to the world: Concrete Experience vs. Abstract
conceptualization, and Active Experimentation vs. Reflective Observation. (37)
|
Since there is evidence that learning, change, and growth are
best facilitated by an integrated process that includes all four abilities,
reflection should be encouraged. This ability is very often neglected in an
action-oriented society because it takes time and is often perceived as an
exercise that inhibits progress. |