- Does the assessment tool answer the questions you are asking? For
example, if you were asking how does a learner's achievement in
his/her comprehension compare with others of the same age - you
would use a norm referenced test. If you want to know what writing
errors a learner is struggling with you may choose to use a work sample
analysis.
- If you are planning to use a formal assessment tool, you will want check
that the norm is appropriate for your learner. If the norm that the results
are measured against is related to a group of elementary primary level
students and you are working with adults, then you need to assess the
impact this would have on the results.
- Is the tool economical in terms of money and/or time? How long will it
take practitioners to learn how to use the tool? How much time will it
take for learners to complete the assessment? How much time is
required to interpret the results?
- The time needed for the learner to engage in the process should be
reasonable. If a time is not provided then common sense prevails. Two
factors to examine when deciding a suitable length of time are the
learners the program serves and the staff availability.
- The assessment material should be consistent with what is currently
known about learning disabilities. Theories and definitions of learning
disabilities have changed over time, so you need to ensure the basis for
the screening tool is reflective of the most recent research. Copyright
dates are not the best guide because the tool may have been based on an
earlier theory about learning disabilities, but may have been revised
every few years.
- Research supports the links between screening procedures and
instructional materials. If there are recommendations for learning
strategies based on the results of the screening, then you need to feel
confident that they reflect the predicted learning disabilities.
"The
validity information should show the screening test results can
accurately predict which intervention, material, or procedure is better.
Without that information, treat the recommendations with extreme
caution." 56
|