None of the comparisons of Tables 2 and 3 matched auding and reading rates (Goldstein's (1940) work closely approximated this match), although a number of the comprehension studies limited reading time either to the time required to present the message in spoken form, or to the time required for students to read the material through once at their normal rates. In some comprehension studies effects of manipulation of the latter two controls were assessed (Young, 1930; Russell, 1923; Webb and Wallon, 1956), and these are recorded as separate comparisons in Table 3.

Table 3

Summary of Research Comparing Auding and Reading Comprehension
Grade Level Controls Used Reference
Subjects Materials Presentation Order Auding, Reading Rates Matched Reading Time Matched to Auding Time Reading Time Not Specified Results
3 Identical Identical Counter-balanced A > R Erickson, Col. and King, I. 1917
Identical Identical Counter-balanced A > R Miller, E.A. 1941
4 A > R Brassard, M.B. 1970
Identical Identical Counter-balanced A = R Emslie, E.A., et al. 1954
Identical Identical Counter-balanced A > R Erickson, C.I. and King, I. 1917
Continued