- While the Women's Secretariat presents a feminist
analysis of issues, there is often a lack of feminist process. Individuals'
best intentions to be inclusive, collaborative, and consultative are often
impeded by the bureaucratic structures within which public servants function.
Traditional work relationships and structures continue to permeate the
workplace and there is generally a lack of opportunity to explore alternatives.
The decision-making process often does not include those who will be directly
affected by those decisions, and there is a lack of time and energy to attend
to the emotional needs of staff members. Furthermore, the Women's Secretariat
remains somewhat marginalized from other government departments and there is
the sense that, as employees, our performance must be superior as a means of
avoiding criticism and further marginalization within the bureaucracy.
Denials
|
Outsiders may view the
emotional description of personal experiences as
irrational, which increases an insider's sense of alienation,
and anger, and contributes to self-blame. |
|
- The emotional complexities of my work being credible,
legitimate, and worthy of redress have often been denied. Using the work of
Narayan I liken my experience as a woman adult educator in the area of sexual
harassment prevention to being in a position of oppression (Narayan). Narayan
argues that oppressed insiders have more immediate, subtle, and critical
knowledge regarding their oppression and consequently treat their experiences
more seriously. She identifies a number of ways in which outsiders may view the
emotional description of personal experiences as excessive, silly, irrational,
or manipulative, which increases an insider's sense of alienation, grief, and
anger and also contributes to self-doubt and self-blame.
- As an adult educator, I have experienced my own denial of
the emotional, psychological, and physical costs associated with doing social
change work. Doubting my feelings and questioning my analysis limits my
ability to contextualize my work within a broader social and political
framework and prevents me from making sense of my experience. The problem, then
becomes one of being too sensitive to do my job. Ironically, this
oversimplification is also commonly directed at recipients of harassment, such
as "if you weren't so sensitive the problem would just go away," or "if you had
only said something, this would have never happened."
- The relationship between the educator and the learner is
not always benign or even mutually beneficial. In the theory of adult
education there is little emphasis on creating a safe and respectful learning
environment for the educator; as a woman adult educator I am frequently at risk
of being harassed by participants. And because there is such a backlash against
a variety of equity-related issues, including the introduction of mandatory
education regarding the prevention of sexual harassment, those of us working in
the area are particularly vulnerable, especially those of us visibly connected
to a feminist philosophy. Shore and Butler suggest that some adult educators
"experience resistance in the very process of publicly naming and practicing
from a feminist standpoint" (3). We who are the messengers of social change
often become the target for expressions of frustration and anger with respect
to that change.
|